Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39183058›Full record

ReviewBritish medical bulletin2024

Long COVID among healthcare workers: a narrative review of definitions, prevalence, symptoms, risk factors and impacts.

Brendan Dempsey, Ira Madan, Sharon A M Stevelink, Danielle Lamb

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British medical bulletin, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Living With Persistent Respiratory Symptoms of Long COVID: Qualitative Study Among Brazilian Adults 12 Months After Acute Infection.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brendan DempseyDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7659-7398
Ira MadanGuy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas' Education Centre, 75-79 York Road, London, SE1 7NJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2200-7329
Sharon A M StevelinkDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, 16 De Crespigny Park, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7655-7986
Danielle LambDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1526-9793

Funding

Colt Foundation CF/01/22Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustNational Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR300592National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLong COVID (LC) occurs when people experience symptoms for weeks, months or even years after a COVID-19 infection. This review looks at research exploring the LC definitions, prevalence, symptoms, risk factors, and associated impacts in research on healthcare workers (HCWs). DATA SOURCES: We systematically searched five electronic databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline, PsycInfo and PubMed) and compiled a narrative literature review based on 56 relevant studies. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: LC is prevalent among HCWs who become infected by COVID-19. Many of the most frequent symptoms associated with LC in the general population are also reported among HCWs. Some risk factors for LC are also similar to those in the general population, such as female sex, older age, and having a pre-existing respiratory illness. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: The mechanism(s) responsible for LC remains unknown. A variety of terms, timeframes and symptoms are used to define LC, creating difficulties in comparing results across studies. Much of the research is cross-sectional and fails to explore the impacts that prolonged symptoms have on HCWs' personal and professional lives. GROWING POINTS: The need to support HCWs with LC is clear. Identifying the mechanism(s) responsible for LC is a key priority, as this will inform treatments. AREAS FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: Future research should move towards a standard definition for LC. Greater attention should be paid to longitudinal and qualitative studies, which could give insights into prognosis, lived experience and work participation. Finally, studies evaluating treatments suitable for people with LC are timely.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeHumansPrevalenceRisk FactorsSARS-CoV-2healthcare staffhealthcare workerslong COVIDongoing symptomatic COVIDpost-COVID-19 conditionpost-COVID-19 syndrome

Identifiers

PMID39183058
PMCPMC11436955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.