ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2024
A conditional multi-label model to improve prediction of a rare outcome: An illustration predicting autism diagnosis.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Predicting Partially Observed Long-Term Outcomes with Adversarial Positive-Unlabeled Domain Adaptation.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to develop a novel approach using routinely collected electronic health records (EHRs) data to improve the prediction of a rare event. We illustrated this using an example of improving early prediction of an autism diagnosis, given its low prevalence, by leveraging correlations between autism and other neurodevelopmental conditions (NDCs).
methodsTo achieve this, we introduced a conditional multi-label model by merging conditional learning and multi-label methodologies. The conditional learning approach breaks a hard task into more manageable pieces in each stage, and the multi-label approach utilizes information from related neurodevelopmental conditions to learn predictive latent features. The study involved forecasting autism diagnosis by age 5.5 years, utilizing data from the first 18 months of life, and the analysis of feature importance correlations to explore the alignment within the feature space across different conditions.
resultsUpon analysis of health records from 18,156 children, we are able to generate a model that predicts a future autism diagnosis with moderate performance (AUROC=0.76). The proposed conditional multi-label method significantly improves predictive performance with an AUROC of 0.80 (p < 0.001). Further examination shows that both the conditional and multi-label approach alone provided marginal lift to the model performance compared to a one-stage one-label approach. We also demonstrated the generalizability and applicability of this method using simulated data with high correlation between feature vectors for different labels.
conclusionOur findings underscore the effectiveness of the developed conditional multi-label model for early prediction of an autism diagnosis. The study introduces a versatile strategy applicable to prediction tasks involving limited target populations but sharing underlying features or etiology among related groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.