Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39182614›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons2025

Contemporary prevalence and practice patterns of out-of-sequence kidney allocation.

Luckmini N Liyanage, Daniyar Akizhanov, Suhani S Patel, Dorry L Segev, Allan B Massie, Darren E Stewart, Sommer E Gentry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evolution of out-of-sequence liver allocation, 2019-2024.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Outcomes of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplants Allocated Out of Sequence in the United States.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2026
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Out-of-Sequence Placement of Deceased Donor Kidneys Is Exacerbating Inequities in the United States.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2026
    Article
  14. The early impacts of an attempt to standardize kidney procurement biopsy practices.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Association between out-of-sequence allocation and deceased donor kidney nonuse across organ procurement organizations.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2025
    Article
  17. Underrecognition of deceased donor kidney out-of-sequence allocation due to increasing use of free-text coding.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Optimizing kidney allocation: challenges and solutions.Current opinion in organ transplantation · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luckmini N LiyanageDepartment of Surgery, NYU Langone, New York, New York, USA. Electronic address: lliyana5675@gmail.com.
Daniyar AkizhanovDepartment of Surgery, NYU Langone, New York, New York, USA.
Suhani S PatelDepartment of Surgery, NYU Langone, New York, New York, USA.
Dorry L SegevDepartment of Surgery, NYU Langone, New York, New York, USA; Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Allan B MassieDepartment of Surgery, NYU Langone, New York, New York, USA.
Darren E StewartDepartment of Surgery, NYU Langone, New York, New York, USA.
Sommer E GentryDepartment of Surgery, NYU Langone, New York, New York, USA; Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

Continuous allocation score design for guaranteeing equity and reducing discards in kidney and liver transplantationR01DK132395 · NIDDK · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Allan B Massie · 2023 to 2026
$2.7M
Patient Oriented Research in Solid Organ TransplantationK24AI144954 · NIAID · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI SEGEV, DORRY L. · 2020 to 2024
$956k
Diagnosing disparities in existing and proposed allocation systems for kidney transplantationF32DK136310 · NIDDK · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI LIYANAGE, LUCKMINI · 2024 to 2025
$192k
NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI144954NIDDK NIH HHS F32 DK136310NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK132395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since 2021, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network has reported a nearly 10-fold rise in out-of-sequence (OOS) kidney allocation, generating concern and halting development of continuous distribution policies. We report contemporary (2022-2023) practice patterns in OOS allocation using Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data. We examined in sequence vs OOS donors with multivariable logistic regression and skipped vs OOS-accepting recipients with conditional logistic regression. Nearly 20% of kidney placements were OOS, varying from 0% to 43% acsoss organ procurement organizations; the 5 highest OOS-organ procurement organizations accounted for 29% of all OOS. Of OOS kidneys, 33% were declined ≥100 times in the standard allocation sequence and 51% were declined by ≥10 centers before OOS allocation began; 4.5% were made without any in-sequence declines. Nearly, all OOS offers were open offers. OOS kidneys were more likely to be from female, Black, older, donation after cardiac death, hypertensive, diabetic, and elevated creatinine donors. Candidates receiving OOS kidneys were more likely female, Asian, and older than skipped candidates. Higher-volume centers and centers with more White, fewer Hispanic, and more educated waiting list patients underwent transplantation disproportionately with more OOS kidneys. These findings suggest that the current, highly variable, discretionary use of OOS might exacerbate disparities, yet the impact of OOS on organ utilization cannot be determined with data now collected.

Indexed as

Kidney Failure, ChronicKidney TransplantationPractice Patterns, Physicians'Resource AllocationTissue and Organ ProcurementTissue DonorsAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalencePrognosisWaiting Listsexpedited placementkidney allocationkidney transplantout-of-sequence placement

Identifiers

PMID39182614
PMCPMC11772121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.