Trial reportJournal of the American Medical Directors Association2024
Feasibility of a Novel Lighting System to Reduce Nighttime Falls in Assisted Living Residents With Dementia.
Trial report in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Person-Centered Technology for Older Adults: Benefits, Limitations, and Considerations in Design and Use.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026Article
- Effect of COVID-19 on Falls in a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly: Longitudinal Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo determine the feasibility of conducting a trial of a novel nighttime lighting system designed to support postural stability in assisted living (AL) residents, and to estimate intervention effectiveness by comparing the incidence of nighttime falls during the novel lighting condition to that in a control condition featuring a standard nightlight.
designRandomized crossover trial. The intervention consisted of 3 custom-designed linear arrays of amber light-emitting diodes (LEDs) arranged in strips: 1 strip aligned horizontally across the top of the bathroom/entry doorframe containing 68 LEDs and 2 strips of 140 LEDs each aligned vertically down the sides of the doorframe. The control condition was 1 standard nightlight in the bedroom and 1 in the bathroom. Residents were randomized to treatment sequences, receiving each condition for 1-2 quarters. SETTING AND
participantsFive AL communities serving exclusively residents with dementia or having separate units for residents with dementia, with at least 30 beds and at least 5 residents in private rooms. Residents were eligible if they had dementia, were ambulatory, did not share a bedroom, were not on hospice or expected to die within the year, and were not expected to transfer to another setting within the year.
methodsOutcomes included recruitment, retention, incident falls, and satisfaction.
resultsThirty-eight residents of the 5 communities participated (56% recruitment rate), and 24 family members completed surveys about their satisfaction with the lighting system. Cameras captured falls data for 92% of 8591 resident nights. The incidence density for falls was 34% lower in the intervention condition than the control condition (incidence density ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.35, 1.22), which did not reach statistical significance (P = .18). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This low-cost intervention was feasible with high satisfaction. Building on these results, the intervention is being evaluated in a larger clinical trial. A novel lighting system to reduce falls could ultimately benefit millions of older adults across all settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.