Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39182262›Full record

ReviewEpilepsy & behavior : E&B2024

Catatonia and epilepsy: An underappreciated relationship.

Jonathan P Rogers, Simon Shorvon, James Luccarelli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Epilepsy & behavior : E&B, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jonathan P RogersDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK. Electronic address: jonathan.rogers@ucl.ac.uk.
Simon ShorvonQueen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
James LuccarelliDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.

Funding

Translational Neuroscience Training for CliniciansT32MH112485 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BUCKNER, RANDY L, ROFFMAN, JOSHUA LAWRENCE · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH112485Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Catatonia is currently conceived in the major diagnostic manuals as a syndrome with a range of possible psychiatric and general medical underlying conditions. It features diverse clinical signs, spanning motor, verbal and behavioural domains and including stupor, catalepsy, mutism, echolalia, negativism and withdrawal. The existing literature suggests that seizure activity may underlie catatonia in approximately 2% of cases. There are three possible temporal relationships between catatonia and seizure activity: (1) ictal catatonia, in which catatonia is a presentation of non-convulsive status epilepticus; (2) postictal catatonia, in which catatonia follows a seizure, and (3) interictal catatonia, in which catatonia and seizures occur in the same individual without any clear temporal relationship between them. Electroencephalographic (EEG) abnormalities are common in catatonia, even in those cases with a presumed primary psychiatric origin, and often consist of generalised background slowing. Paradoxically, electroconvulsive therapy is an effective treatment for catatonia. There are several converging pieces of evidence suggesting that there may be underlying seizure activity in more cases of catatonia than has hitherto been recognised, though identification of these seizures may require intracranial EEG recording.

Indexed as

CatatoniaElectroencephalographyEpilepsyElectroconvulsive TherapyHumansCatatoniaElectroconvulsive therapyElectroencephalogramEpilepsySeizure

Identifiers

PMID39182262
PMCPMC12139465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.