SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024
Predictors of return to work after spinal surgery : systematic review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Return to Work After Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Prospective Data From a Swedish Nationwide Cohort of 789 Patients.Neurosurgery · 2026Article
- The Effectiveness of the Back At work After Surgery (BAAS) Work-Integrated Care Pathway on Return to Work for Patients Receiving Knee Arthroplasty: A Study of Three Comparative Cohorts in the Netherlands.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Long-term outcomes of total lumbar disc prosthesis: Sustained pain relief.North American Spine Society journal · 2025Article
- Return to Work Following Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Percutaneous Posterior Pedicle Fixation: A Retrospective Analysis from Two Academic Centers in Germany.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo analyze the situation and influencing factors of patients returning to work after spinal surgery, and to provide reference for clinical intervention measures of patients returning to work after spinal surgery.
methodsA computer search was conducted in Chinese and English database on the situation and influencing factors of patients returning to work after spinal surgery from the establishment of the database to February 2023. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 and StataMP 17.0 software.
resultsA total of 10 literatures were included, involving 11,548 subjects. Meta-analysis results showed that 58% of patients returned to work after spinal surgery [95%CI (0.47-0.69)]. Gender [OR = 2.41, 95%CI (1.58-3.37)], age [OR = 1.32, 95%CI (1.03-1.51)], job nature [OR = 5.94, 95%CI (3.54-9.62)], education level [OR = 0.23, 95%CI (0.06-0.48)], fear of disease progression [OR = 0.82, 95%CI (0.84-0.95)], and social support [OR = 1.21, 95%CI (1.12-1.37)] were the influencing factors for patients returning to work after spinal surgery.
conclusionThe rate of patients returning to work after spinal surgery is low, and is affected by many factors. Medical personnel should pay comprehensive attention to the above high-risk groups and give timely intervention and support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.