ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2024
Pulmonary mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma: insights from a 15-year study at a single institution involving 14 clinical cases.
Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Five Cases of Primary Pulmonary Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue (MALT) Lymphoma With Atypical Image Findings and Literature Review: A Case Series.Respirology case reports · 2026Article
- B-cell lymphoma initially presenting as isolated pleural effusion: a challenging diagnostic case report.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Case Report: pulmonary MALT lymphoma withFrontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Non-gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphomas: a narrative review of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment strategies.Annals of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Pulmonary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with concurrent organizing pneumonia: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to delineate the clinical presentations, imaging features, pathological characteristics, therapeutic strategies, and outcomes of pulmonary mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, thereby deducing the most efficacious treatment paradigm.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of 14 patients diagnosed with pulmonary MALT lymphoma at the Second Xiangya Hospital, affiliated with Central South University, between September 2007 and September 2022, focusing on their clinical profiles, diagnostic pathways, treatment modalities, and prognostic outcomes.
resultsThe cohort's median age was 60 years (ranging from 44 to 81 years), with 64.29% being female and only 14.29% having a history of smoking. The incidence of immunodeficiency diseases among the patients was notably low. Imaging typically revealed pulmonary nodules and masses, with air bronchogram signs evident in 9 patients and pleural effusion in 2. CD20 expression was markedly positive across the board in all patients with pulmonary MALT lymphoma. Among the 12 patients who received intervention, 6 were treated with chemotherapy alone, 2 underwent surgical resection, and 4 benefitted from a combined approach of chemotherapy and surgery. Over the monitoring period, 2 patients succumbed to their disease. The estimated 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates were 91.67% and 76.39%, respectively, with the median progression-free survival (PFS) reaching 7 years. Comparative analysis revealed no significant disparity in PFS between patients treated exclusively with chemotherapy and those receiving both chemotherapy and surgical intervention (P = 0.22).
conclusionPulmonary MALT lymphoma typically exhibits a slow course, with gradual progression and a predominantly positive prognosis. Chemotherapy emerges as the preferred therapeutic option for managing this malignancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.