ArticleBMC genomics2024
Analyzing RNA-Seq data from Chlamydia with super broad transcriptomic activation: challenges, solutions, and implications for other systems.
Article in BMC genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification and validation of butyrate metabolism-related biomarkers for colorectal cancer diagnosis.PeerJ · 2026Article
- Smelly communication between haemaphysalis longicornis and infected hosts with indolic odorants: A case from severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- A lineage-specific heat-induced feedback loop controls HrcA to promote chlamydial fitness under stress.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Investigation of mitochondrial DNA methylation-related prognostic biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) offers profound insights into the complex transcriptomes of diverse biological systems. However, standard differential expression analysis pipelines based on DESeq2 and edgeR encounter challenges when applied to the immediate early transcriptomes of Chlamydia spp., obligate intracellular bacteria. These challenges arise from their reliance on assumptions that do not hold in scenarios characterized by extensive transcriptomic activation and limited repression.
resultsStandard analyses using unique chlamydial RNA-Seq reads alone identify nearly 300 upregulated and about 300 downregulated genes, significantly deviating from actual RNA-Seq read trends. By incorporating both chlamydial and host reads or adjusting for total sequencing depth, the revised normalization methods each detected over 700 upregulated genes and 30 or fewer downregulated genes, closely aligned with observed RNA-Seq data. Further validation through qRT-PCR analysis confirmed the effectiveness of these adjusted approaches in capturing the true extent of transcriptomic activation during the immediate early phase of chlamydial infection.
conclusionsThis study highlights the limitations of standard RNA-Seq analysis tools in scenarios with extensive transcriptomic activation, such as in Chlamydia spp. during early infection. Our revised normalization methods, incorporating host reads or total sequencing depth, provide a more accurate representation of gene expression dynamics. These approaches may inform similar adjustments in other systems with unbalanced gene expression dynamics, enhancing the accuracy of transcriptomic analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.