Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39182003›Full record

ArticleJournal of human hypertension2024

Validation of combiomed hipermax-BF model A7101 automatic oscillometric upper-arm sphygmomanometer in general population: AAMI/ESH/ISO universal standard (ISO 81060-2:2018/Amd 1:2020).

Damaris Hernández Véliz, Yamilé Valdés González, Nurys Bárbara Armas Rojas, Reinaldo De la Noval García, Jennifer Ringrose, Raj Padwal

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Damaris Hernández Véliz *Institute of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, 17th street 702 between A and Paseo Avenue, Havana, 10400, Cuba.
Yamilé Valdés González *Institute of Endocrinology, Zapata street and D street, Havana, 10400, Cuba. gonzalezvaldes1974@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1437-7031
Nurys Bárbara Armas RojasInstitute of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, 17th street 702 between A and Paseo Avenue, Havana, 10400, Cuba.
Reinaldo De la Noval GarcíaInstitute of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, 17th street 702 between A and Paseo Avenue, Havana, 10400, Cuba.
Jennifer RingroseUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4170-2784
Raj PadwalUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3541-2817

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates the accuracy of the Hipermax-BF model A7101 (Combiomed, Havana, Cuba) automatic oscillometric upper-arm sphygmomanometer for office and home use in general population as part of the HEARTS in the Americas initiative. The research was developed according to the Universal Standard AAMI/ESH/ISO ISO 81060-2:2018/Amd 1:2020. The subjects were recruited according to the requirements of age, gender, blood pressure values and upper-arm circumference. The same upper-arm sequential blood pressure measurement method was used. For measurements with the device under test, the 2-piece cuff from 22-44 cm limb circumference range was used. 92 subjects were recruited and 85 were analyzed. Mean age was 44.8 ± 14.7 years, mean upper-arm circumference was 32.3 ± 6.2, and 56.5% were female. For Validation Criterion 1, the mean value ± standard deviation of the differences in readings between the device under test and the reference device was 1.2 ± 4.9/0.8 ± 4.9 mmHg (systolic/diastolic). For both pressures, in criterion 1 the standard requires a mean value of the differences ≤ ± 5 mmHg and a standard deviation ≤ ± 8 mmHg. For Validation Criterion 2, the standard deviation of the mean blood pressure differences per subject was 4.2/4.2 mmHg (systolic/diastolic). According to Table 1 of criterion 2, for the mean values of 1.2/0.8 mmHg (systolic/diastolic), the maximum allowable standard deviation had to be < 6.84 for systolic and < 6.89 for diastolic pressure. The Combiomed Hipermax-BF A7101 automatic sphygmomanometer meets the requirements of the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018/Amd 1:2020) in the general population.

Indexed as

Blood Pressure DeterminationOscillometrySphygmomanometersAdultAgedArmBlood PressureEquipment DesignFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.