ArticleScientific reports2024
Performance enhancement of deep learning based solutions for pharyngeal airway space segmentation on MRI scans.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automatic measurement of pharyngeal contraction ratio during deglutition using 2D cine MRI with deep learning: A pilot study.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Pediatric Craniofacial Surgery.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The automatic segmentation of the pharyngeal airway space has many potential medical use, one of which is to help facilitate the creation of the Tubingen Palatal Plate. Therefore, it is of great importance to understand which methods are suitable for this task. Here, neural network based solutions available in the literature are compared to find the best methods. Neural network models were chosen to encompass a diverse landscape. Some models were taken from the general semantic segmentation literature, while others were taken from the medical or pharyngeal airway space segmentation literature. Some models are convolutional neural networks, while others are transformer-based model or a mix of both convolutional and transformer-based model. These models include 2d/3d U-Net, Deeplabv3, YOLOv8, Swinv2 UNETR, SegFormer, and 3D MRU-Net. Furthermore, additional strategies to enhance performance were also considered. These strategies consisted of training two separate networks in multiple stages as well leveraging unlabeled data to pretrain the neural networks before fine-tuning them on the labeled data. It was found that out of all the models considered here, the 2d U-Net performed the best achieving an average dice score of 0.9180 ± 0.0111. Out of all the strategies to enhance performance, only two strategies improve the actual results but only by a small margin. Therefore, these strategies can be consider if a small increase in performance is desired from the 2d U-Net at the expense of computational resource.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.