ArticleScientific reports2024
Predictive validity of resource-adjusted Korean Triage and Acuity Scale in pediatric gastrointestinal tract foreign body patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A nationwide comparative study of pediatric and adult intussusception in emergency departments during the COVID-19.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A pediatric emergency prediction model using natural language process in the pediatric emergency department.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although paediatric patients with gastrointestinal (GI) foreign bodies require multiple resources, they often present with few or no discernible symptoms and are typically assigned a low acuity level during triage. We compared the predictive accuracy of the revised Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (rKTAS), which elevates acuity by one step in relation to anticipated resource utilization, with that of the conventional KTAS for clinical outcomes. This was a retrospective study of National Emergency Department Information System data. Data on patient and ED characteristics, resources used, and clinical outcomes were collected from January 2018 to December 2021 for patients with GI foreign bodies aged under 19. The primary outcome was rKTAS accuracy in predicting hospitalization, ICU admission, operating room (OR) use, and ED length of stay (EDLOS). The AUROC was used to evaluate the performance via of the KTAS and rKTAS. In total, 25,324 paediatric patients visited the ED for GI tract foreign bodies. The mean age was 3.8 years, and 51% (12,923) were between 1 and 4 year old. Although most (23,658; 93.4%) were discharged, 4.9% required hospitalization. Two or more resources were utilized in 2514 (9.9%) cases, and 3,514 individuals had their triage levels increased by one step. Compared with those of the KTAS, the AUROCs of the rKTAS for predicting overall hospitalization (p < 0.05), admission to general wards (p < 0.05), ICU admission (p = 0.01), and admission via the OR (p < 0.05)were higher than KTAS. Compared with that with the KTAS, the EDLOS with the rKTAS was longer at levels 1, 2, and 3. The adjusted rKTAS is a better predictor of clinical outcomes for paediatric patients with GI tract foreign bodies than the KTAS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.