Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39181941›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2024

IMPRESS: Improved methylation profiling using restriction enzymes and smMIP sequencing, combined with a new biomarker panel, creating a multi-cancer detection assay.

Janah Vandenhoeck, Isabelle Neefs, Thomas Vanpoucke, Joe Ibrahim, Arvid Suls, Dieter Peeters, Anne Schepers, Alexander Hoischen, Erik Fransen, Marc Peeters and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Janah Vandenhoeck *Centre of Medical Genetics, University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2358-8671
Isabelle Neefs *Centre of Medical Genetics, University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8500-389X
Thomas Vanpoucke *Centre of Medical Genetics, University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Joe IbrahimCentre of Medical Genetics, University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Arvid SulsCentre of Medical Genetics, University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Dieter PeetersDepartment of Pathology, Antwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.
Anne SchepersCentre of Medical Genetics, University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Alexander HoischenDepartment of Human Genetics and Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Erik FransenCentre of Medical Genetics, University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Marc PeetersCentre for Oncological Research Antwerp (CORE), University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Guy Van CampCentre of Medical Genetics, University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Ken Op de BeeckCentre of Medical Genetics, University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium. ken.opdebeeck@uantwerpen.be.

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Research Foundation Flanders) 11B5220NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Research Foundation Flanders) IS67523NUniversiteit Antwerpen (University of Antwerp) BOF/Methusalem grant 40790Universiteit Antwerpen (University of Antwerp) BOF/TOP 39705Universiteit Antwerpen (University of Antwerp) IOF/SBO 43782
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the worldwide progress in cancer diagnostics, more sensitive diagnostic biomarkers are needed. The methylome has been extensively investigated in the last decades, but a low-cost, bisulfite-free detection method for multiplex analysis is still lacking.

methodsWe developed a methylation detection technique called IMPRESS, which combines methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes and single-molecule Molecular Inversion Probes. We used this technique for the development of a multi-cancer detection assay for eight of the most lethal cancer types worldwide. We selected 1791 CpG sites that can distinguish tumor from normal tissue based on DNA methylation. These sites were analysed with IMPRESS in 35 blood, 111 tumor and 114 normal samples. Finally, a classifier model was built.

resultsWe present the successful development of IMPRESS and validated it with ddPCR. The final classifier model discriminating tumor from normal samples was built with 358 CpG target sites and reached a sensitivity of 0.95 and a specificity of 0.91. Moreover, we provide data that highlight IMPRESS's potential for liquid biopsies.

conclusionsWe successfully created an innovative DNA methylation detection technique. By combining this method with a new multi-cancer biomarker panel, we developed a sensitive and specific multi-cancer assay, with potential use in liquid biopsies.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCpG IslandsDNA MethylationNeoplasmsDNA Restriction EnzymesHumansLiquid BiopsyBiomarkers, TumorDNA Restriction Enzymes

Identifiers

PMID39181941
PMCPMC11442765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.