ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2024
Constraint-based modelling predicts metabolic signatures of low and high-grade serous ovarian cancer.
Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcriptome-driven constraint-based modelling reveals metabolic targets for ovarian cancer.Cancer & metabolism · 2026Article
- From mechanistic models to artificial intelligence: exploring the potential of digital twins in geriatric oncology.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Cell-intrinsic platinum response and associated genetic and gene expression signatures in ovarian cancer.Cancer gene therapy · 2025Article
- Modeling the metabolic response of A2780 ovarian cancer cells to gold-based cytotoxic drugs.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Article
- Metabolic Reprogramming Shapes the Progression and Therapeutic Landscape of Ovarian Cancer.Cancer management and research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is an aggressive, heterogeneous disease, burdened with late diagnosis and resistance to chemotherapy. Clinical features of ovarian cancer could be explained by investigating its metabolism, and how the regulation of specific pathways links to individual phenotypes. Ovarian cancer is of particular interest for metabolic research due to its heterogeneous nature, with five distinct subtypes having been identified, each of which may display a unique metabolic signature. To elucidate metabolic differences, constraint-based modelling (CBM) represents a powerful technology, inviting the integration of 'omics' data, such as transcriptomics. However, many CBM methods have not prioritised accurate growth rate predictions, and there are very few ovarian cancer genome-scale studies. Here, a novel method for CBM has been developed, employing the genome-scale model Human1 and flux balance analysis, enabling the integration of in vitro growth rates, transcriptomics data and media conditions to predict the metabolic behaviour of cells. Using low- and high-grade ovarian cancer, subtype-specific metabolic differences have been predicted, which have been supported by publicly available CRISPR-Cas9 data from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopaedia and an extensive literature review. Metabolic drivers of aggressive, invasive phenotypes, as well as pathways responsible for increased chemoresistance in low-grade cell lines have been suggested. Experimental gene dependency data has been used to validate areas of the pentose phosphate pathway as essential for low-grade cellular growth, highlighting potential vulnerabilities for this ovarian cancer subtype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.