Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39181893›Full record

ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2024

Constraint-based modelling predicts metabolic signatures of low and high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Kate E Meeson, Jean-Marc Schwartz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kate E MeesonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Jean-Marc SchwartzSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. jean-marc.schwartz@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6472-0184

Funding

RCUK | Medical Research Council (MRC) MRC DTP
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is an aggressive, heterogeneous disease, burdened with late diagnosis and resistance to chemotherapy. Clinical features of ovarian cancer could be explained by investigating its metabolism, and how the regulation of specific pathways links to individual phenotypes. Ovarian cancer is of particular interest for metabolic research due to its heterogeneous nature, with five distinct subtypes having been identified, each of which may display a unique metabolic signature. To elucidate metabolic differences, constraint-based modelling (CBM) represents a powerful technology, inviting the integration of 'omics' data, such as transcriptomics. However, many CBM methods have not prioritised accurate growth rate predictions, and there are very few ovarian cancer genome-scale studies. Here, a novel method for CBM has been developed, employing the genome-scale model Human1 and flux balance analysis, enabling the integration of in vitro growth rates, transcriptomics data and media conditions to predict the metabolic behaviour of cells. Using low- and high-grade ovarian cancer, subtype-specific metabolic differences have been predicted, which have been supported by publicly available CRISPR-Cas9 data from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopaedia and an extensive literature review. Metabolic drivers of aggressive, invasive phenotypes, as well as pathways responsible for increased chemoresistance in low-grade cell lines have been suggested. Experimental gene dependency data has been used to validate areas of the pentose phosphate pathway as essential for low-grade cellular growth, highlighting potential vulnerabilities for this ovarian cancer subtype.

Indexed as

Ovarian NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorFemaleHumansMetabolic Networks and PathwaysModels, Biological

Identifiers

PMID39181893
PMCPMC11344801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.