Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39181869›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Self-assembled superstructure alleviates air-water interface effect in cryo-EM.

Liming Zheng, Jie Xu, Weihua Wang, Xiaoyin Gao, Chao Zhao, Weijun Guo, Luzhao Sun, Hang Cheng, Fanhao Meng, Buhang Chen and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Foam film vitrification for cryo-EM.Nature communications · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Liming Zheng *Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.ORCID 0009-0008-3174-4922
Jie Xu *Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Protein Sciences, Beijing Frontier Research Center for Biological Structures, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Weihua Wang *China Academy of Aerospace Science and Innovation, Beijing, 100088, China.
Xiaoyin Gao *Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Chao ZhaoFaculty of Materials Science and Energy Engineering, Shenzhen University of Advanced Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China. c.zhao1@siat.ac.cn.ORCID 0009-0001-5479-1595
Weijun GuoBeijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Luzhao SunBeijing Graphene Institute (BGI), Beijing, 100095, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0518-0744
Hang ChengShuimu BioSciences Ltd, Beijing, 100089, China.
Fanhao MengShuimu BioSciences Ltd, Beijing, 100089, China.
Buhang ChenBeijing Graphene Institute (BGI), Beijing, 100095, China.
Weiyu SunBeijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Xia JiaMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Protein Sciences, Beijing Frontier Research Center for Biological Structures, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Xiong ZhouBeijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8990-5783
Kai WuBeijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5016-0251
Zhongfan LiuBeijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5554-1902
Feng DingFaculty of Materials Science and Energy Engineering, Shenzhen University of Advanced Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9153-9279
Nan LiuMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Protein Sciences, Beijing Frontier Research Center for Biological Structures, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China. nanliuem@tsinghua.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-4102-2428
Hong-Wei WangMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Protein Sciences, Beijing Frontier Research Center for Biological Structures, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China. hongweiwang@tsinghua.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-9494-8780
Hailin PengBeijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China. hlpeng@pku.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-1569-0238

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 52021006, T2188101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) has been widely used to reveal the structures of proteins at atomic resolution. One key challenge is that almost all proteins are predominantly adsorbed to the air-water interface during standard cryo-EM specimen preparation. The interaction of proteins with air-water interface will significantly impede the success of reconstruction and achievable resolution. Here, we highlight the critical role of impenetrable surfactant monolayers in passivating the air-water interface problems, and develop a robust effective method for high-resolution cryo-EM analysis, by using the superstructure GSAMs which comprises surfactant self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) and graphene membrane. The GSAMs works well in enriching the orientations and improving particle utilization ratio of multiple proteins, facilitating the 3.3-Å resolution reconstruction of a 100-kDa protein complex (ACE2-RBD), which shows strong preferential orientation using traditional specimen preparation protocol. Additionally, we demonstrate that GSAMs enables the successful determinations of small proteins (<100 kDa) at near-atomic resolution. This study expands the understanding of SAMs and provides a key to better control the interaction of protein with air-water interface.

Indexed as

AirCryoelectron MicroscopyGraphiteWaterHumansProteinsSurface-Active AgentsGraphiteProteinsSurface-Active AgentsWater

Identifiers

PMID39181869
PMCPMC11344764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.