Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39181859›Full record

ArticleNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2024

Predictors of pharyngeal electrical stimulation treatment success in tracheotomised stroke patients with dysphagia: Secondary analysis from PHADER cohort study.

Ivy Cheng, Philip M Bath, Shaheen Hamdy, Paul Muhle, Satish Mistry, Rainer Dziewas, Sonja Suntrup-Krueger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Treating postextubation dysphagia after stroke with pharyngeal electrical stimulation -insights from a randomized controlled pilot trial.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ivy ChengAcademic Unit of Human Communication, Learning, and Development, Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Centre for Gastrointestinal Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignal Analysis, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Department of Neurology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Philip M BathStroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; Stroke, Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Shaheen HamdyCentre for Gastrointestinal Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Department for Clinical Research, Phagenesis Limited, Manchester, UK.
Paul MuhleInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignal Analysis, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Department of Neurology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Satish MistryDepartment for Clinical Research, Phagenesis Limited, Manchester, UK.
Rainer DziewasDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany; Department of Neurology, Klinikum Osnabrück GmbH, Osnabrück, Germany.
Sonja Suntrup-KruegerInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignal Analysis, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Department of Neurology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany. Electronic address: Sonja.Suntrup-Krueger@ukmuenster.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES) has emerged as a promising intervention for neurogenic dysphagia, with potential benefits in reducing dysphagia severity in stroke patients. PES may facilitate decannulation in tracheotomised stroke patients with dysphagia, yet the predictive factors for treatment success have not been investigated in detail. This study used data from the PHAryngeal electrical stimulation for treatment of neurogenic Dysphagia European Registry (PHADER) study to identify predictive factors for PES treatment success among patients with post stroke dysphagia who required mechanical ventilation and tracheotomy. Multiple linear regression was performed to predict treatment success, as measured in improvement in dysphagia severity rating scale (DSRS), accounting for age, sex, stroke type, lesion location, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, feeding status, time from stroke onset to PES, PES perceptual threshold and PES stimulation intensity at the first session. Cox regression was conducted to identify the predictors for decannulation for all participants. Ninety-eight participants (mean [SD] age ​= ​66.6 [13.0]; male 73.5%) were included in the analyses. Regression analyses showed that early intervention (p ​= ​0.004) and younger age (p ​= ​0.049) were significant predictors for treatment success. For participants who received PES during tracheotomy (n ​= ​60; mean [SD] age ​= ​66.6 [11.2]; male 73.3%), supratentorial stroke (p ​= ​0.033) and feeding status at baseline (p ​= ​0.025) were predictors of treatment success. Among all participants, early intervention was associated with higher likelihood of decannulation (p ​= ​0.026). These results highlight the importance of timely intervention, age and stroke location in PES treatment success for stroke patients with mechanical ventilation and tracheotomy.

Indexed as

Deglutition DisordersElectric Stimulation TherapyPharynxStrokeTracheotomyAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesTreatment OutcomeDysphagiaElectrical stimulationPharynxStrokeTracheotomy

Identifiers

PMID39181859
PMCPMC11579862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.