ArticleNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2024
Predictors of pharyngeal electrical stimulation treatment success in tracheotomised stroke patients with dysphagia: Secondary analysis from PHADER cohort study.
Article in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Neuromuscular-related interventions for post-stroke dysphagia: a comprehensive narrative review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Treating postextubation dysphagia after stroke with pharyngeal electrical stimulation -insights from a randomized controlled pilot trial.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025Trial
- Management of Absent Upper Esophageal Sphincter Opening After Neurological Injury.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Pharyngeal electrical stimulation for the treatment of dysphagia in Wallenberg syndrome: A FEES-based case analysis.eNeurologicalSci · 2026Article
- Brainstem Stroke and Dysphagia Treatment: A Narrative Review on the Role of Neuromodulation, Skill-Based Swallowing Training and Transient Receptor Potential Agonists.Audiology research · 2025Review
- Post-extubation dysphagia in the ICU-a narrative review: epidemiology, mechanisms and clinical management (Update 2025).Critical care (London, England) · 2025Review
- Predictive Factors of Successful Decannulation in Tracheostomy Patients: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Clinical predictors of outcome after pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES) in non-stroke related neurogenic dysphagia after mechanical ventilation and tracheotomy: results from subgroup analysis of PHADER study.Neurological research and practice · 2025Article
- Decannulation ahead: a comprehensive diagnostic and therapeutic framework for tracheotomized neurological patients.Neurological research and practice · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES) has emerged as a promising intervention for neurogenic dysphagia, with potential benefits in reducing dysphagia severity in stroke patients. PES may facilitate decannulation in tracheotomised stroke patients with dysphagia, yet the predictive factors for treatment success have not been investigated in detail. This study used data from the PHAryngeal electrical stimulation for treatment of neurogenic Dysphagia European Registry (PHADER) study to identify predictive factors for PES treatment success among patients with post stroke dysphagia who required mechanical ventilation and tracheotomy. Multiple linear regression was performed to predict treatment success, as measured in improvement in dysphagia severity rating scale (DSRS), accounting for age, sex, stroke type, lesion location, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, feeding status, time from stroke onset to PES, PES perceptual threshold and PES stimulation intensity at the first session. Cox regression was conducted to identify the predictors for decannulation for all participants. Ninety-eight participants (mean [SD] age = 66.6 [13.0]; male 73.5%) were included in the analyses. Regression analyses showed that early intervention (p = 0.004) and younger age (p = 0.049) were significant predictors for treatment success. For participants who received PES during tracheotomy (n = 60; mean [SD] age = 66.6 [11.2]; male 73.3%), supratentorial stroke (p = 0.033) and feeding status at baseline (p = 0.025) were predictors of treatment success. Among all participants, early intervention was associated with higher likelihood of decannulation (p = 0.026). These results highlight the importance of timely intervention, age and stroke location in PES treatment success for stroke patients with mechanical ventilation and tracheotomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.