ArticleComparative medicine2024
Effectiveness, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Meloxicam Formulations in African-clawed Frogs, Xenopus laevis.
Article in Comparative medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pain management in amphibians is an emerging field of veterinary medicine with only a limited number of analgesics studied for their efficacy. The African-clawed frog, Xenopus laevis, is a popular animal model in research due to its oocyte morphology and embryonic development. We investigated analgesic effects of 2 formulations of meloxicam (standard and extended release [ER]) along with their pharmacokinetics and potential toxicity in this species. Adult female African-clawed frogs (n = 6/group) received either standard (0.2, 0.4, 1, or 5 mg/kg) or ER meloxicam (0.6, 1.2, 3, or 15 mg/kg) injected into the dorsal lymph sac. The acetic acid test (AAT) was performed at -1, 1, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h postadministration to evaluate pain response. In addition, a subset of frogs (n = 2/group) were euthanized 72 h postinjection and submitted for necropsy. There were no significant differences in AAT with both formulations compared with saline control. No signs of meloxicam-induced toxicity with either formulation was present in histology. A pharmacokinetic study was conducted for both the standard and ER formulation of meloxicam at 5 and 15 mg/kg, respectively. Results were consistent with the fact that both formulations of meloxicam were readily absorbed with the standard plasma concentrations peaking at 20.40 µg/mL at 2 h and ER plasma concentration at 30.4 µg/mL at 12 h. The elimination half-life was only determinable for standard formulation (7.74 h). According to the AAT, both formulations of meloxicam did not provide effective analgesia in adult female Xenopus laevis despite reaching high plasma concentrations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.