ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2024
Performance Characteristics of Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Engraftment Monitoring and Microchimerism Detection in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Practical Approach for Clinical Assay Validation.
Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhanced genetic diagnosis in early pregnancy loss: an integrated approach using CNV-Seq and STR genotyping.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chimerism analysis by next-generation sequencing (NGS) is an emerging method for engraftment monitoring after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. A high-sensitivity method is required for the detection of microchimerism (<1% chimerism), which may have clinical utility in early relapse detection, allograft monitoring in organ transplantation, and other allogeneic cellular therapies (such as microtransplantations). As more clinical laboratories adopt this method, a thorough assessment of performance is needed. This study evaluated one such NGS-based assay that uses both single-nucleotide polymorphisms and insertions/deletions as genetic markers. An assessment of accuracy, linearity, sensitivity, and reproducibility was performed. Analytical sensitivity was 0.2% donor for single donor and 0.5% donors for double donors. The assay showed a high degree of reproducibility over a full range of chimerism. Comparison to short-tandem-repeat (STR) PCR showed high concordance; yet <5% chimerism was consistently detected by NGS, but not by STR-PCR. Comparison to real-time quantitative PCR showed high concordance, but with lower correlation in the midrange (40% to 60% chimerism). Overall, the assay showed consistent performance with high sensitivity and accuracy compared with STR-PCR and real-time quantitative PCR across a full range of chimerism in the setting of single-donor and multidonor transplantations. In addition, criteria for quality metrics were established for sequencing performance and data analysis and considerations made for clinical laboratory validation of NGS-based chimerism assay and analysis software.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.