ArticleNanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine2024
In vitro assessment of nanomedicines' propensity to cause palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia: A Doxil vs. doxorubicin case study.
Article in Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Charting new frontiers in nanoparticle immunotoxicity: A perspective on current, emerging, and future approaches.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2025Review
- Nucleic acid nanobiosystems for cancer theranostics: an overview of emerging trends and challenges.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Review
- Advancing Medical Applications of Cancer Nanotechnology: Highlighting Two Decades of the NCI'S Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory Service to the Research Community.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE), also known as hand and foot syndrome, is a condition characterized by inflammation-mediated damage to the skin on the palms and soles of the hands and feet. PPE limits the successful therapeutic applications of anticancer drugs. However, identifying this toxicity during preclinical studies is challenging due to the lack of accurate in vitro and in vivo animal-based models. Therefore, there is a need for reliable models that would allow the detection of this toxicity early during the drug development process. Herein, we describe the use of an in vitro skin explant assay to assess traditional DXR, Doxil reference listed drug (RLD) and two generic PEGylated liposomal DXR formulations for their abilities to cause inflammation and skin damage. We demonstrate that the results obtained with the in vitro skin explant assay model for traditional DXR and Doxil correlate with the clinical data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.