Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39181025›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2024

Overtreatment and Undertreatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer in Older Women: Evaluating the POWER Trial.

Lena M Turkheimer, Janet Yan, Trish Millard, Henna Ragoowansi, Shayna L Showalter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lena M TurkheimerDepartment of Surgery, University Of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Janet YanSchool of Medicine, University Of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Trish MillardDepartment of Medicine, University Of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Henna RagoowansiSchool of Medicine, University Of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Shayna L ShowalterDepartment of Surgery, University Of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia. Electronic address: SNL2T@uvahealth.org.

Funding

Postdoctoral Training Grant for MDs in Surgical Oncology ResearchT32CA163177 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI Craig Lee Slingluff, Allan Tsung · 2011 to 2026
$4.6M
Patient-Centered Insights from the POWER Trial: Pre-Operative Window of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy to Inform Radiation Therapy Decisions in Older Women with Early-Stage Breast CancerR21CA277311 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI SHOWALTER, SHAYNA LEFRAK · 2023 to 2024
$409k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA277311NCI NIH HHS T32 CA163177
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRadiation therapy (RT) omission is acceptable in older women with early-stage estrogen receptor + breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET). However, RT rates in this population remain high, causing concern for overtreatment. Conversely, patients who omit RT and do not complete a course of AET are at risk of undertreatment. In the Pre-Operative Window of Endocrine Therapy to Inform Radiation Therapy Decisions (POWER) trial, participants receive 90 days of preoperative endocrine therapy to assess tolerance before deciding about RT. This study aimed to determine the rates of undertreatment and overtreatment institutionally and among POWER trial participants.

methodsData were retrospectively collected from medical records of women aged ≥ 65 years diagnosed with invasive, estrogen receptor +/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2- breast cancer, ≤ 3 cm, who had BCS between 2012 and 2022. Patients were categorized as undertreated (BCS alone), overtreated (BCS + RT + AET), or appropriately treated (BCS + RT or BCS + AET).

resultsThe cohort included 478 patients, of whom 62 (12.97%) were undertreated, 202 (42.26%) were overtreated, and 214 (44.77%) were appropriately treated. Appropriately treated patients were more likely to be aged 70-79 years (P < 0.0001) and have high health literacy (P = 0.0003). Of the 37 patients (7.71%) in the POWER trial, more were appropriately treated than patients not in the POWER trial (81.1% versus 44.8%) (P < 0.0001).

conclusionsDespite long-standing guideline changes, RT utilization remains high. This study highlights how a novel patient-centered approach to guide adjuvant therapy decisions may increase the number of appropriately treated patients.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMastectomy, SegmentalOvertreatmentAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMedical OveruseNeoplasm StagingRadiotherapy, AdjuvantReceptors, EstrogenRetrospective StudiesUndertreatmentAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalReceptors, EstrogenBreast cancerEndocrine therapyRadiation

Identifiers

PMID39181025
PMCPMC11490386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.