Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39180771›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024

An Ensemble Spectral Prediction (ESP) model for metabolite annotation.

Xinmeng Li, Yan Zhou Chen, Apurva Kalia, Hao Zhu, Li-Ping Liu, Soha Hassoun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. MS2Query: reliable and scalable MSNature communications · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xinmeng LiDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, United States.
Yan Zhou ChenDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, United States.
Apurva KaliaDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, United States.
Hao ZhuDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3386-6076
Li-Ping LiuDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, United States.
Soha HassounDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9477-2199

Funding

Deep Learning Models for Metabolomics AnalysisR35GM148219 · NIGMS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI Soha Hassoun · 2023 to 2026
$1.4M
Using machine learning techniques to characterize the Metabolomics Workbench DatasetR03OD030601 · OD · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI HASSOUN, SOHA · 2020 to 2020
$263k
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM148219NIH HHS R03 OD030601NIH HHS R35GM148219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationA key challenge in metabolomics is annotating measured spectra from a biological sample with chemical identities. Currently, only a small fraction of measurements can be assigned identities. Two complementary computational approaches have emerged to address the annotation problem: mapping candidate molecules to spectra, and mapping query spectra to molecular candidates. In essence, the candidate molecule with the spectrum that best explains the query spectrum is recommended as the target molecule. Despite candidate ranking being fundamental in both approaches, limited prior works incorporated rank learning tasks in determining the target molecule.

resultsWe propose a novel machine learning model, Ensemble Spectral Prediction (ESP), for metabolite annotation. ESP takes advantage of prior neural network-based annotation models that utilize multilayer perceptron (MLP) networks and Graph Neural Networks (GNNs). Based on the ranking results of the MLP- and GNN-based models, ESP learns a weighting for the outputs of MLP and GNN spectral predictors to generate a spectral prediction for a query molecule. Importantly, training data is stratified by molecular formula to provide candidate sets during model training. Further, baseline MLP and GNN models are enhanced by considering peak dependencies through label mixing and multi-tasking on spectral topic distributions. When trained on the NIST 2020 dataset and evaluated on the relevant candidate sets from PubChem, ESP improves average rank by 23.7% and 37.2% over the MLP and GNN baselines, respectively, demonstrating performance gain over state-of-the-art neural network approaches. However, MLP approaches remain strong contenders when considering top five ranks. Importantly, we show that annotation performance is dependent on the training dataset, the number of molecules in the candidate set and candidate similarity to the target molecule. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The ESP code, a trained model, and a Jupyter notebook that guide users on using the ESP tool is available at https://github.com/HassounLab/ESP.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMetabolomicsNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsMetabolome

Identifiers

PMID39180771
PMCPMC11344591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.