ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
An Ensemble Spectral Prediction (ESP) model for metabolite annotation.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- PyCompound: An Open-Source Python Package for Spectral-Library Matching in Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomics.Metabolites · 2026Article
- mFLIP: metabolic flux interval prediction.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Learning from All Views: A Multiview Contrastive Framework for Metabolite Annotation.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- De Novo Structure Prediction from Tandem Mass Spectra: Algorithms, Benchmarks, and Limitations.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- FLARE: Fine-grained Learning for Alignment of spectra-molecule REpresentation Enhances Metabolite Annotation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in Implementation of Machine Learning for Environmental Nontarget Identification.Environment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
- Learning from All Views: A Multiview Contrastive Framework for Metabolite Annotation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- General Intelligence-based Fragmentation (GIF): A framework for peak-labeled spectra simulation.ArXiv · 2025Article
- JESTR: Joint Embedding Space Technique for Ranking candidate molecules for the annotation of untargeted metabolomics data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Article
- Recent advances in mass spectrometry-based computational metabolomics.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2023Review
- MS2Query: reliable and scalable MSNature communications · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationA key challenge in metabolomics is annotating measured spectra from a biological sample with chemical identities. Currently, only a small fraction of measurements can be assigned identities. Two complementary computational approaches have emerged to address the annotation problem: mapping candidate molecules to spectra, and mapping query spectra to molecular candidates. In essence, the candidate molecule with the spectrum that best explains the query spectrum is recommended as the target molecule. Despite candidate ranking being fundamental in both approaches, limited prior works incorporated rank learning tasks in determining the target molecule.
resultsWe propose a novel machine learning model, Ensemble Spectral Prediction (ESP), for metabolite annotation. ESP takes advantage of prior neural network-based annotation models that utilize multilayer perceptron (MLP) networks and Graph Neural Networks (GNNs). Based on the ranking results of the MLP- and GNN-based models, ESP learns a weighting for the outputs of MLP and GNN spectral predictors to generate a spectral prediction for a query molecule. Importantly, training data is stratified by molecular formula to provide candidate sets during model training. Further, baseline MLP and GNN models are enhanced by considering peak dependencies through label mixing and multi-tasking on spectral topic distributions. When trained on the NIST 2020 dataset and evaluated on the relevant candidate sets from PubChem, ESP improves average rank by 23.7% and 37.2% over the MLP and GNN baselines, respectively, demonstrating performance gain over state-of-the-art neural network approaches. However, MLP approaches remain strong contenders when considering top five ranks. Importantly, we show that annotation performance is dependent on the training dataset, the number of molecules in the candidate set and candidate similarity to the target molecule. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The ESP code, a trained model, and a Jupyter notebook that guide users on using the ESP tool is available at https://github.com/HassounLab/ESP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.