ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2025
Quantitative parameters of HRCT target scan to predict the risk of lung adenocarcinoma based on the detection of lung ground-glass nodules.
Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo explore the value of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ground-glass nodules (GGNs), and to provide a theoretical basis for the clinical application of HRCT.
methodsA total of 208 patients with GGN who had been clinically confirmed by surgical pathology and clinical confirmation were collected, and HRCT target scanning technology was used to scan and collect general information of patients, and observe the distribution of GGN, GGN size, GGN cross-sectional area, diameter, transverse diameter, solid composition, relationship with bronchi, and relationship with blood vessels and other indicators. Multivariate regression analysis and risk factor prediction are performed.
resultsThe differences were statistically significant in multivariate regression analysis, such as nodule location, maximum diameter, maximum cross-sectional area, GGN status, nodule boundary and relationship with blood vessels (P < 0.05). The results of ROC curve showed that the AUC value of nodule site and nodule boundary was greater than 0.5, and the nodule boundary AUC value was 0.676, which was more sensitive to predict whether GGN deteriorated to lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD).
conclusionNodule site and nodule boundary are effective risk predictors for LUAD in patients with GGN, and nodule boundary is the most valuable independent predictor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39180703What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.