ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2024
Pulsed focused ultrasound alters the proteomic profile of the tumor microenvironment in a syngeneic mouse model of glioblastoma.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Focused ultrasound for enhancing cell-based immunotherapies in neuro-oncology.Neuro-oncology advances · 2026Review
- Ultrasound-Enhanced Drug Delivery in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology: A New Therapeutic Strategy.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Ultrasound-responsive nanoparticles for imaging and therapy of brain tumors.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeGlioblastoma (GBM), a lethal primary adult malignancy, is difficult to treat because of the restrictive nature of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), blood-tumor barrier (BTB), and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Since pulsed focused ultrasound (pFUS) is currently used to improve therapeutic deliveries across these barriers, this study aims to characterize the impact of pFUS on the TME proteomics upon opening the BBB and BTB.
methodsWe utilized MRI-guided, pFUS with ultrasound contrast microbubbles (termed 'pFUS' herein) to selectively and transiently open the BBB and BTB investigating proteomic modifications in the TME. Utilizing an orthotopically-allografted mouse GL26 GBM model (Ccr2RFP/wt - Cx3cr1GFP/wt), pFUS's effect on glioma proteomics was evaluated using a Luminex 48-plex assay.
resultspFUS treated tumors exhibited increases in pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and trophic factors (CCTFs). Proteomic changes in tumors tend to peak at 24 h after single pFUS session (1x), with levels then plateauing or declining over the subsequent 24 h. Tumors receiving three pFUS sessions (3x) showed elevated CCTFs levels peaking as early as 6 h after the third session.
conclusionspFUS together with microbubbles induces a sterile inflammatory response in the TME of a mouse GBM tumor. Moreover, this proinflammatory shift can be sustained and perhaps primed for more rapid responses upon multiple sessions of pFUS. These findings raise the intriguing potential that pFUS-induced BBB and BTB opening may not only be effective in facilitating the therapeutic agent delivery, but also be harnessed to modify the TME to assist immunotherapies in overcoming immune evasion in GBM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.