ReviewImmunological reviews2024
The function of antibodies.
Review in Immunological reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protein nanoparticle-based vaccine candidate produced inFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Explore antibody repertoire in the era of AI.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2025Article
- Neutralizing Antibodies: Role in Immune Response and Viral Vector Based Gene Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Acute infectious mononucleosis generates persistent, functional EBNA-1 antibodies with high cross-reactivity to alpha-crystalline beta.Cell reports · 2025Article
- Advances and challenges in leukemia treatment: A focus on monoclonal antibodies and emerging therapies.Oncology research · 2025Review
- The function of antibodies.Immunological reviews · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibodies have multiple biological activities. They can both recognize and act on specific antigens. They can protect against and cause serious diseases, enhance and inhibit antibody responses, enable survival, and threaten life. Which among their many, often antagonistic properties explains that antibodies were selected half a billion years ago and transmitted to mammals across millions of generations? In other words, what is the function of antibodies? Here I examine how their structure endows antibodies with unique cognitive and effector properties that contribute to their multiple biological activities. I show that rather than specific properties, antibodies have large functional repertoires. They have a cognitive repertoire and an effector repertoire that are selected from larger available repertoires, themselves drawn at random from even larger virtual repertoires. These virtual repertoires provide the adaptive immune system with immense, constantly renewed, reservoirs of cognitive and effector functions that can be actualized at any time according to the context. I propose that such a flexibility, which enables living individuals to adapt to a rapidly changing environment, and even deal with an unknown future, may provide a better selective advantage than any particular function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.