Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39180466›Full record

ReviewImmunological reviews2024

The function of antibodies.

Marc Daëron

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunological reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Explore antibody repertoire in the era of AI.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The function of antibodies.Immunological reviews · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Marc DaëronCentre d'Immunologie de Marseille-Luminy (CIML), Aix Marseille Université-CNRS-Inserm, Marseille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5651-9851

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibodies have multiple biological activities. They can both recognize and act on specific antigens. They can protect against and cause serious diseases, enhance and inhibit antibody responses, enable survival, and threaten life. Which among their many, often antagonistic properties explains that antibodies were selected half a billion years ago and transmitted to mammals across millions of generations? In other words, what is the function of antibodies? Here I examine how their structure endows antibodies with unique cognitive and effector properties that contribute to their multiple biological activities. I show that rather than specific properties, antibodies have large functional repertoires. They have a cognitive repertoire and an effector repertoire that are selected from larger available repertoires, themselves drawn at random from even larger virtual repertoires. These virtual repertoires provide the adaptive immune system with immense, constantly renewed, reservoirs of cognitive and effector functions that can be actualized at any time according to the context. I propose that such a flexibility, which enables living individuals to adapt to a rapidly changing environment, and even deal with an unknown future, may provide a better selective advantage than any particular function.

Indexed as

AntibodiesAntibody FormationAdaptive ImmunityAnimalsAntigensHumansAntibodiesAntigensantibody receptorsfunctional repertoiresselection

Identifiers

PMID39180466
PMCPMC13459521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.