Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39180368›Full record

ArticleCancer science2024

A novel index combining fecal immunochemical test, DNA test, and age improves detection of advanced colorectal adenoma.

Yukari Inoue, Akiyo Ishiguro, Yutaka Suehiro, Yuki Kunimune, Yuko Yamaoka, Shinichi Hashimoto, Katsuhiko Nakamura, Atsushi Goto, Koichi Hamabe, Toshihiko Matsumoto and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Yukari InoueFaculty of Medicine, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Akiyo IshiguroDepartment of Oncology and Laboratory Medicine, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Yutaka SuehiroDepartment of Oncology and Laboratory Medicine, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8822-0053
Yuki KunimuneDepartment of Oncology and Laboratory Medicine, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Yuko YamaokaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Shinichi HashimotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Katsuhiko NakamuraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Atsushi GotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Koichi HamabeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Toshihiko MatsumotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Shinobu TomochikaDepartment of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Shingo HigakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, St. Hill Hospital, Ube, Japan.
Ikuei FujiiAjisu Kyoritsu Hospital, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Chieko SuzukiAjisu Kyoritsu Hospital, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Michiko KogaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Advanced Clinical Research Center, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeya TsutsumiDivision of Infectious Diseases, Advanced Clinical Research Center, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Lay Ahyoung LimDepartment of Research, Kitasato Institute Hospital, Kitasato University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuo MatsubaraDepartment of Oncology and General Medicine, IMSUT Hospital of The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi YotsuyanagiDivision of Infectious Diseases, Advanced Clinical Research Center, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroaki NaganoDepartment of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7074-3315
Naoki YamamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Isao SakaidaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Taro TakamiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Mitsuaki NishiokaDivision of Laboratory, Yamaguchi University Hospital, Ube, Japan.
Takahiro YamasakiDepartment of Oncology and Laboratory Medicine, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 25460687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin (FIT) is a widely used screening test for colorectal cancer, it is not sensitive enough to detect advanced colorectal adenoma. To address this issue, we performed this study to investigate whether combining the FIT and fecal DNA testing of methylated somatostatin (SST) could improve diagnostic performance for advanced colorectal adenoma. We collected feces from 79 healthy subjects with negative results on colonoscopy, 43 patients with non-advanced colorectal adenoma, 117 patients with advanced colorectal adenoma, and 126 patients with colorectal cancer. After fecal DNA was incubated with methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes, SST methylation levels were measured by droplet digital PCR. Using logistic multivariate analysis, we established a prediction formula for detecting colorectal neoplasia and named it the FAMS (FIT, age, methylated SST) index. The diagnostic performance of a single use of FIT for advanced colorectal adenoma showed a sensitivity of 29.1% (34/117) and specificity of 89.3% (109/122). In contrast, the FAMS index showed a sensitivity of 56.4% (66/117) at a similar specificity point of 91.0% (111/122). Furthermore, even at the higher specificity point of 94.3% (115/122), the sensitivity was still higher than that of FIT, reaching 42.7% (50/117). As the FAMS index showed better diagnostic performance for advanced colorectal adenoma than a single use of FIT, the FAMS index could be a promising tool for detecting advanced colorectal adenoma.

Indexed as

AdenomaColorectal NeoplasmsDNA MethylationFecesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBiomarkers, TumorColonoscopyEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHemoglobinsHumansMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorHemoglobinsSomatostatinadvanced colorectal adenomafecal DNA testfecal immunochemical test for hemoglobinmethylationSST

Identifiers

PMID39180368
PMCPMC11531960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.