ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2024
Machine learning models for outcome prediction in thrombectomy for large anterior vessel occlusion.
Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning Models in Predicting Functional Outcome of Thrombectomy for Acute Posterior Circulation Artery Occlusion: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Pooled it
- Combining Machine Learning With Real-World Data to Identify Gaps in Clinical Practice Guidelines: Feasibility Study Using the Prospective German Stroke Registry and the National Acute Ischemic Stroke Guidelines.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePredicting long-term functional outcomes shortly after a stroke is challenging, even for experienced neurologists. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate multiple machine learning models and the importance of clinical/radiological parameters to develop a model that balances minimal input data with reliable predictions of long-term functional independency.
methodsOur study utilized data from the German Stroke Registry on patients with large anterior vessel occlusion who underwent endovascular treatment. We trained seven machine learning models using 30 parameters from the first day postadmission to predict a modified Ranking Scale of 0-2 at 90 days poststroke. Model performance was assessed using a 20-fold cross-validation and one-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Key features were identified through backward feature selection.
resultsWe included 7485 individuals with a median age of 75 years and a median NIHSS score at admission of 14 in our analysis. Our Deep Neural Network model demonstrated the best performance among all models including data from 24 h postadmission. Backward feature selection identified the seven most important features to be NIHSS after 24 h, age, modified Ranking Scale after 24 h, premorbid modified Ranking Scale, intracranial hemorrhage within 24 h, intravenous thrombolysis, and NIHSS at admission. Narrowing the Deep Neural Network model's input data to these features preserved the high performance with an AUC of 0.9 (CI: 0.89-0.91).
interpretationOur Deep Neural Network model, trained on over 7000 patients, predicts 90-day functional independence using only seven clinical/radiological features from the first day postadmission, demonstrating both high accuracy and practicality for clinical implementation on stroke units.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.