ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences2024
Effect of blood pressure control on the risk of proteinuria during bevacizumab treatment in patients with colorectal cancer: a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Prospective Comparison of Azilsartan and Amlodipine for Bevacizumab-induced Hypertension and Proteinuria in Colorectal Cancer.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Trial
- Effect of intravitreal bevacizumab on kidney function and proteinuria among diabetic patients: a prospective observational study in Asian population.Renal failure · 2026Observational
- Article
- VEGF inhibitor-induced proteinuria: the role of hypertension and vascular endothelial dysfunction.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2026Review
- Mechanisms, Imaging Phenotypes, and Therapeutic Advances of Neovascularization in Brain Metastases.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Current Status of Research on Losartan in Tumour Therapy.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Potential role of endothelial dysfunction in hypertension and proteinuria in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab: a pilot prospective observational study.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2025Observational
- Adverse Reactions With VEGF Inhibitors in Combination With NSAIDs: Disproportionality Analysis Using JADRE and FAERS.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePre-existing hypertension is reportedly a major risk factor for bevacizumab-induced proteinuria. However, few studies have focused on the effects of blood pressure (BP) control on proteinuria during bevacizumab treatment. We report a retrospective study of the association between poor BP control and the risk of developing proteinuria in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).
methodsData for CRC patients who received bevacizumab between April 2015 and March 2022 were retrospectively collected. Patients were categorized into two groups based on average systolic blood pressure (SBP) during treatment: normal SBP (< 140 mmHg) and high SBP (≥ 140 mmHg). To evaluate the association between average SBP and grade ≥ 2 proteinuria, we used a 3 month landmark analysis and a Cox regression model.
resultsOf the 279 patients analyzed, 109 had high SBP and 170 had normal SBP. The cumulative incidence of grade ≥ 2 and severe proteinuria was significantly higher in the high compared to the normal SBP group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.028, respectively). Landmark analysis indicated significant differences in proteinuria between patients with and without high average SBP during the first 3 months of treatment (p = 0.002 and p = 0.015, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that average SBP ≥ 140 mmHg was a significant independent risk factor for proteinuria (p = 0.008).
conclusionLandmark analysis showed that BP status during the first 3 months of bevacizumab treatment influences the risk of subsequent proteinuria. Therefore, timely diagnosis and stricter BP control are recommended for at least the first 3 months to avoid severe proteinuria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.