ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024
Predicting high blood pressure using machine learning models in low- and middle-income countries.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contrastive Machine Learning to Quantify Hypertensive Multiorgan Damage and Identify New Disease Phenotypes: A Multinational Multimodal Study.Circulation · 2026Article
- The role of artificial intelligence in hypertension management.Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension · 2026Review
- Prevalence and risk factors of hypertension in rural Bangladesh: A population-based cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Machine learning to predict the role of CHWs in shifting birth preferences away from homebirth in India.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Prediction of primary Hypertension in Primary Health Care Settings in Coastal Karnataka Using Artificial Neural Network.Current hypertension reviews · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Responding to the rising global prevalence of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) requires improvements in the management of high blood pressure. Therefore, this study aims to develop an explainable machine learning model for predicting high blood pressure, a key NCD risk factor, using data from the STEPwise approach to NCD risk factor surveillance (STEPS) surveys. Nationally representative samples of adults aged 18-69 years were acquired from 57 countries spanning six World Health Organization (WHO) regions. Data harmonization and processing were performed to standardize the selected predictors and synchronize features across countries, yielding 41 variables, including demographic, behavioural, physical, and biochemical factors. Five machine learning models - logistic regression, k-nearest neighbours, random forest, XGBoost, and a fully connected neural network - were trained and evaluated at global, regional, and country-specific levels using an 80/20 train-test split. The models' performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. Feature importance analysis identified age, weight, heart rate, waist circumference, and height as key predictors of blood pressure. Across the 57 countries studied, model performances varied considerably, with accuracy ranging from as low as 58.96% in some models for specific countries to as high as 81.41% in others, underscoring the need for region and country-specific adaptations in modelling approaches. The explainable model offers an opportunity for population-level screening and continuous risk assessment in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.