Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39180074›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2024

Identification of Enterococcus spp. by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry isolated from clinical mastitis and bulk tank milk samples.

Felipe Freitas Guimarães, G N Moraes, S F Joaquim, S T Guerra, F M Dalanezi, M S R Mioni, F M H Medeiros, S B Lucheis, F S Possebon, J C F Pantoja and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Felipe Freitas GuimarãesDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Rua Prof. Doutor Walter Mauricio Correa, s/n, UNESP campus Botucatu, Botucatu, 18618-681, SP, Brazil. felipefreitasguimaraes@hotmail.com.
G N MoraesDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Rua Prof. Doutor Walter Mauricio Correa, s/n, UNESP campus Botucatu, Botucatu, 18618-681, SP, Brazil.
S F JoaquimDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Rua Prof. Doutor Walter Mauricio Correa, s/n, UNESP campus Botucatu, Botucatu, 18618-681, SP, Brazil.
S T GuerraDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Rua Prof. Doutor Walter Mauricio Correa, s/n, UNESP campus Botucatu, Botucatu, 18618-681, SP, Brazil.
F M DalaneziDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Rua Prof. Doutor Walter Mauricio Correa, s/n, UNESP campus Botucatu, Botucatu, 18618-681, SP, Brazil.
M S R MioniDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Rua Prof. Doutor Walter Mauricio Correa, s/n, UNESP campus Botucatu, Botucatu, 18618-681, SP, Brazil.
F M H MedeirosDepartment of Pathology, Reproduction and One Health, Faculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences (FCAV), Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, 14884- 900, SP, Brazil.
S B LucheisDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Rua Prof. Doutor Walter Mauricio Correa, s/n, UNESP campus Botucatu, Botucatu, 18618-681, SP, Brazil.
F S PossebonDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Rua Prof. Doutor Walter Mauricio Correa, s/n, UNESP campus Botucatu, Botucatu, 18618-681, SP, Brazil.
J C F PantojaDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Rua Prof. Doutor Walter Mauricio Correa, s/n, UNESP campus Botucatu, Botucatu, 18618-681, SP, Brazil.
M G RibeiroDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Rua Prof. Doutor Walter Mauricio Correa, s/n, UNESP campus Botucatu, Botucatu, 18618-681, SP, Brazil.
V L M RallDepartment of Chemical and Biological Sciences, Sector of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Biosciences, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, 18618-689, SP, Brazil.
R T HernandesDepartment of Chemical and Biological Sciences, Sector of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Biosciences, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, 18618-689, SP, Brazil.
D S LeiteDepartment of Genetics, Evolution, Microbiology, and Immunology, University of Campinas, Campinas, 13083-970, SP, Brazil.
H LangoniDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Rua Prof. Doutor Walter Mauricio Correa, s/n, UNESP campus Botucatu, Botucatu, 18618-681, SP, Brazil.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2015/19688-8, 2017/08823-7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThroughout a three-year study period, 1,577 bovine clinical mastitis samples and 302 bulk tank samples were analyzed from ten Brazilian dairy herds. Enterococcus spp. was isolated and identified in 93 (5.9%) clinical mastitis samples. In addition, 258 Enterococcus spp. were isolated from the bulk tank samples of the same herds. The identification of Enterococcus spp. isolated from bulk tanks and milk samples of clinical mastitis were accomplished by phenotypic characteristics and confirmed by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry (MS). Fisher test was performed to verify the difference between bulk tanks and mastitis samples.

resultsThe following species were identified from clinical mastitis: E. saccharolyticus (62.4%), E. faecalis (19.4%), E. faecium (15.1%), E. hirae (1.1%), E. mundtii (1.1%), E. durans (1.1%). Furthermore, from 258 bulk tank milk samples, eight enterococci species were isolated: E. faecalis (67.8%), E. hirae (15.1%), E. faecium (4.6%), E. saccharolyticus (4.6%), E. mundtii (3.1%), E. caseliflavus ( 2.7%), E. durans (1.2%), E. galinarum (0.8%).

conclusionsThe difference in species predominance in bulk tank samples (67.8% of E. faecalis) and clinical mastitis (62.4% of E. saccharolyticus) was unexpected and caught our attention. Although Enterococcus spp. are traditionally classified as an environmental mastitis agent, in the present study, E. saccharolyticus behaved as a contagious agent of mastitis, which consequently changed the control patterns to be implemented.

Indexed as

EnterococcusMastitis, BovineMilkSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationAnimalsBrazilCattleFemaleGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsDairy farmE. FaecalisE. SaccharolyticusMastitisMatrix-assisted laser desorption/Ionization

Identifiers

PMID39180074
PMCPMC11342620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.