Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39180070›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2024

A hierarchical deep learning approach for diagnosing impacted canine-induced root resorption via cone-beam computed tomography.

Zeynab Pirayesh, Hossein Mohammad-Rahimi, Saeed Reza Motamedian, Sepehr Amini Afshar, Reza Abbasi, Mohammad Hossein Rohban, Mina Mahdian, Mitra Ghazizadeh Ahsaie, Mina Iranparvar Alamdari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zeynab PirayeshTopic Group Dental Diagnostics and Digital Dentistry, ITU/WHO Focus Group AI on Health, Berlin, Germany.
Hossein Mohammad-RahimiTopic Group Dental Diagnostics and Digital Dentistry, ITU/WHO Focus Group AI on Health, Berlin, Germany.
Saeed Reza MotamedianTopic Group Dental Diagnostics and Digital Dentistry, ITU/WHO Focus Group AI on Health, Berlin, Germany.
Sepehr Amini AfsharDepartment of Computer Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Reza AbbasiDepartment of Computer Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Hossein RohbanDepartment of Computer Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Mina MahdianDivision of Diagnostic Imaging, Department of Prosthodontics and Digital Technology, Stony Brook University School of Dental Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Mitra Ghazizadeh AhsaieDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, California State University, Chico, 95929, USA.
Mina Iranparvar AlamdariDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. mina.iranparvar@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCanine-induced root resorption (CIRR) is caused by impacted canines and CBCT images have shown to be more accurate in diagnosing CIRR than panoramic and periapical radiographs with the reported AUCs being 0.95, 0.49, and 0.57, respectively. The aim of this study was to use deep learning to automatically evaluate the diagnosis of CIRR in maxillary incisors using CBCT images.

methodsA total of 50 cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images and 176 incisors were selected for the present study. The maxillary incisors were manually segmented and labeled from the CBCT images by two independent radiologists as either healthy or affected by root resorption induced by the impacted canines. We used five different strategies for training the model: (A) classification using 3D ResNet50 (Baseline), (B) classification of the segmented masks using the outcome of a 3D U-Net pretrained on the 3D MNIST, (C) training a 3D U-Net for the segmentation task and use its outputs for classification, (D) pretraining a 3D U-Net for the segmentation and transfer of the model, and (E) pretraining a 3D U-Net for the segmentation and fine-tuning the model with only the model encoder. The segmentation models were evaluated using the mean intersection over union (mIoU) and Dice coefficient (DSC). The classification models were evaluated in terms of classification accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score.

resultsThe segmentation model achieved a mean intersection over union (mIoU) of 0.641 and a DSC of 0.901, indicating good performance in segmenting the tooth structures from the CBCT images. For the main classification task of detecting CIRR, Model C (classification of the segmented masks using 3D ResNet) and Model E (pretraining on segmentation followed by fine-tuning for classification) performed the best, both achieving 82% classification accuracy and 0.62 F1-scores on the test set. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed hierarchical, data-efficient deep learning approaches in improving the accuracy of automated CIRR diagnosis from limited CBCT data compared to the 3D ResNet baseline model.

conclusionThe proposed approaches are effective at improving the accuracy of classification tasks and are helpful when the diagnosis is based on the volume and boundaries of an object. While the study demonstrated promising results, future studies with larger sample size are required to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method in enhancing the medical image classification tasks.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyCuspidDeep LearningRoot ResorptionTooth, ImpactedHumansIncisorCone beam computed tomographyDeep learningImpacted toothRoot resorption

Identifiers

PMID39180070
PMCPMC11344340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.