ArticleBMC oral health2024
A hierarchical deep learning approach for diagnosing impacted canine-induced root resorption via cone-beam computed tomography.
Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mesiodens: Clinical Variability, CBCT Evaluation, and Surgical Management, A Three-Case Series.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Position of Impacted Maxillary Canines on Panoramic Radiographs Using Deep Learning with CBCT as the Reference Standard.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Sector Classification of Unerupted Maxillary Canines: A Deep Learning-Based Automated Framework Using Panoramic Radiographs.Orthodontics & craniofacial research · 2026Article
- Reliability of a Deep Learning Model in Predicting Permanent Maxillary Canine Eruption for Preventive Orthodontics: A Comparative Study with Orthodontists.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Hybrid Attention-CNN and Vision Transformer Models for Multi-Class Classification of Third-Second Molar Relationships on CBCT.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- AI-Driven Quantitative Dental Imaging: A Clinical Framework for Assessing Root Resorption Across Treatment Modalities.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Automated deep learning detection of orthodontically induced external apical root resorption in maxillary incisors on panoramic radiographs.Progress in orthodontics · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Models for the Detection and Quantification of Orthodontically Induced Root Resorption Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence performance in maxillary canine impaction: a systematic review.European journal of medical research · 2026Review
- Machine learning for classification of periodontal defects (vertical versus horizontal) using CBCT datasets.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Apical Closure in Panoramic Radiographs Using Vision Transformer Architectures ViT-Based Apical Closure Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- AI-driven dynamic orthodontic treatment management: personalized progress tracking and adjustments-a narrative review.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesCanine-induced root resorption (CIRR) is caused by impacted canines and CBCT images have shown to be more accurate in diagnosing CIRR than panoramic and periapical radiographs with the reported AUCs being 0.95, 0.49, and 0.57, respectively. The aim of this study was to use deep learning to automatically evaluate the diagnosis of CIRR in maxillary incisors using CBCT images.
methodsA total of 50 cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images and 176 incisors were selected for the present study. The maxillary incisors were manually segmented and labeled from the CBCT images by two independent radiologists as either healthy or affected by root resorption induced by the impacted canines. We used five different strategies for training the model: (A) classification using 3D ResNet50 (Baseline), (B) classification of the segmented masks using the outcome of a 3D U-Net pretrained on the 3D MNIST, (C) training a 3D U-Net for the segmentation task and use its outputs for classification, (D) pretraining a 3D U-Net for the segmentation and transfer of the model, and (E) pretraining a 3D U-Net for the segmentation and fine-tuning the model with only the model encoder. The segmentation models were evaluated using the mean intersection over union (mIoU) and Dice coefficient (DSC). The classification models were evaluated in terms of classification accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score.
resultsThe segmentation model achieved a mean intersection over union (mIoU) of 0.641 and a DSC of 0.901, indicating good performance in segmenting the tooth structures from the CBCT images. For the main classification task of detecting CIRR, Model C (classification of the segmented masks using 3D ResNet) and Model E (pretraining on segmentation followed by fine-tuning for classification) performed the best, both achieving 82% classification accuracy and 0.62 F1-scores on the test set. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed hierarchical, data-efficient deep learning approaches in improving the accuracy of automated CIRR diagnosis from limited CBCT data compared to the 3D ResNet baseline model.
conclusionThe proposed approaches are effective at improving the accuracy of classification tasks and are helpful when the diagnosis is based on the volume and boundaries of an object. While the study demonstrated promising results, future studies with larger sample size are required to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method in enhancing the medical image classification tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.