Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39180045›Full record

ArticleBMC urology2024

Performance of large language models (LLMs) in providing prostate cancer information.

Ahmed Alasker, Seham Alsalamah, Nada Alshathri, Nura Almansour, Faris Alsalamah, Mohammad Alghafees, Mohammad AlKhamees, Bader Alsaikhan

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07489261 (Effect of Mobile Application- and Artificial Intelligence-Supported Video-Based Patient Education on Patient Outcomes in Teaching Clean Intermittent Catheterization), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07489261 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Mobile Application- and Artificial Intelligence-Supported Video-Based Patient Education on Patient Outcomes in Teaching Clean Intermittent Catheterization

TypeinterventionalSponsorMersin UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled99ConditionsClean Intermittent CatheterizationArmsMobile application, Artifial intellgience
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Artificial intelligence and patient education.Current opinion in urology · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. ChatGPT's competence in responding to urological emergencies.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2025
    Article
  17. Patient- and clinician-based evaluation of large language models for patient education in prostate cancer radiotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ahmed AlaskerDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Ministry of National Guard - Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Seham AlsalamahKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. seham1alslamh@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7792-459X
Nada AlshathriKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1942-418X
Nura AlmansourKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2443-1299
Faris AlsalamahKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7199-5901
Mohammad AlghafeesDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Ministry of National Guard - Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad AlKhameesDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Ministry of National Guard - Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Bader AlsaikhanDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Ministry of National Guard - Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe diagnosis and management of prostate cancer (PCa), the second most common cancer in men worldwide, are highly complex. Hence, patients often seek knowledge through additional resources, including AI chatbots such as ChatGPT and Google Bard. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of LLMs in providing education on PCa.

methodsCommon patient questions about PCa were collected from reliable educational websites and evaluated for accuracy, comprehensiveness, readability, and stability by two independent board-certified urologists, with a third resolving discrepancy. Accuracy was measured on a 3-point scale, comprehensiveness was measured on a 5-point Likert scale, and readability was measured using the Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) score and Flesch-Kincaid FK Grade Level.

resultsA total of 52 questions on general knowledge, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of PCa were provided to three LLMs. Although there was no significant difference in the overall accuracy of LLMs, ChatGPT-3.5 demonstrated superiority over the other LLMs in terms of general knowledge of PCa (p = 0.018). ChatGPT-4 achieved greater overall comprehensiveness than ChatGPT-3.5 and Bard (p = 0.028). For readability, Bard generated simpler sentences with the highest FRE score (54.7, p < 0.001) and lowest FK reading level (10.2, p < 0.001).

conclusionChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4 and Bard generate accurate, comprehensive, and easily readable PCa material. These AI models might not replace healthcare professionals but can assist in patient education and guidance.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsComprehensionHumansLanguageMalePatient Education as TopicArtificial intelligenceChatbotChatGPTLarge language modelsProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID39180045
PMCPMC11342655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.