Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39179990›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use trajectories and incidence of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections among PrEP users in Belgium: a cohort analysis of insurance claims data from 2017 to 2019.

Anke Rotsaert, Tom Smekens, David Jaminé, Tonio Di Zinno, Jessika Deblonde, Marie-Laurence Lambert, Eric Florence, Thijs Reyniers, Jef Vanhamel, Catherine Lucet and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Anke RotsaertDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155 Antwerp, Antwerp, 2000, Belgium. arotsaert@itg.be.
Tom SmekensDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155 Antwerp, Antwerp, 2000, Belgium.
David JaminéIntermutualistisch Agentschap, Brussels, Belgium.
Tonio Di ZinnoIntermutualistisch Agentschap, Brussels, Belgium.
Jessika DeblondeEpidemiology of Infectious Diseases, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Marie-Laurence LambertINAMI/RIZIV, Brussels, Belgium.
Eric FlorenceDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Thijs ReyniersDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155 Antwerp, Antwerp, 2000, Belgium.
Jef VanhamelDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155 Antwerp, Antwerp, 2000, Belgium.
Catherine LucetSolidaris Mutualité, Brussels, Belgium.
Maarten Schim van der LoeffDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Research and Prevention, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bernadette HensenDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155 Antwerp, Antwerp, 2000, Belgium.
Bea VuylstekeDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155 Antwerp, Antwerp, 2000, Belgium.

Funding

Research Foundation - Flanders S004919N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince June 2017, oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been reimbursed in Belgium for people at substantial risk of HIV. To inform the national PrEP programme, we described sociodemographic characteristics of PrEP users, PrEP dispensing practices, testing for HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs; gonorrhoea, chlamydia and syphilis), and incidence of HIV and STIs.

methodsAnalysis of routinely collected social health insurance claims data from all individuals who were dispensed at least one PrEP prescription between June 2017 and December 2019. Using logistic regression adjusted for age, we examined associations between sociodemographic characteristics and having been dispensed PrEP only once in the first six months of PrEP use.

resultsOverall, 4559 individuals were dispensed PrEP. Almost all PrEP users were male (99.2%, 4522/4559), with a median age of 37 years (IQR 30-45). A minority were entitled to an increased healthcare allowance (11.4%, 514/4559). 18% (657/3636) were dispensed PrEP only once in the first six months of PrEP use. PrEP users younger than 25 years, unemployed, entitled to an increased healthcare allowance, and who initiated PrEP between January 2019 and June 2019 were more likely to have had no PrEP dispensing after initiation compared to their counterparts. The testing rates for bacterial STIs and HIV were 4.2 tests per person-year (95% CI 4.1-4.2) and 3.6 tests per person-year (95% CI 3.5-3.6), respectively. Twelve individuals were identified to have seroconverted during the study period, resulting in an HIV incidence rate of 0.21/100 person-years (95% CI 0.12-0.36). The incidence of bacterial STIs was 81.2/100 person-years (95% CI 78.7-83.8).

conclusionsThe study highlights challenges in PrEP persistence and a high incidence of bacterial STIs among individuals receiving PrEP. Tailored prevention support is crucial for individuals with ongoing HIV risk to optimise PrEP effectiveness. Integrated STI testing and prevention interventions within PrEP care are necessary to mitigate STI acquisition and transmission among PrEP users.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisSexually Transmitted DiseasesAdolescentAdultBelgiumCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceInsurance Claim ReviewMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultClaims dataHIV incidenceHIV preventionLongitudinalPre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)STI

Identifiers

PMID39179990
PMCPMC11342504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.