ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2024
Prevalence of classic and non-classic pain sites of coronary artery disease: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
objectiveThis study aims to assess the prevalence of both classic and non-classic pain sites in patients with ischemic heart disease, emphasizing the importance of recognizing and not disregarding non-classic symptoms.
methodsThis cross-sectional study included 100 patients diagnosed with coronary artery disease (CAD) who were admitted to two major hospitals in Syria. classic pain was identified as pain located in the precordial area, with or without radiation to the neck, jaw, left shoulder or arm. Patients' demographics and previous medical history were documented to investigate any potential associations with non-classic pain.
results62% of the patients experienced non-classic pain, while 12% had no precordial pain. For those without precordial pain, the most common pain site was the left chest (66.7%). Non-classic pain was significantly associated with smoking, with 72.2% of smokers experiencing non-classic pain compared to 35.7% non-smokers (p = 0.001). Additionally, patients with previous heart disease were more likely to have non-classic pain (71.7%), compared with patients with no history of heart disease (51.1%) (p = 0.03). Other factors such as age, sex, and diabetes were not statistically significant.
conclusionNon-classic pain is common, affecting 62% of individuals, primarily in the right shoulder, right arm, and back. This type of pain could be associated with smoking and prior heart disease. Misdiagnosing coronary artery disease can have serious consequences, as patients with non-classic symptoms may miss important pre-hospital procedures like ECG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.