ArticleBMC infectious diseases2024
Analysis of hepatitis B Virus Test results among blood donors in Chongqing, China.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incidence of Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in Patients Treated With Immunosuppressive and Chemotherapeutic Agents.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Nationwide seroprevalence study of hepatitis B and hepatitis C viruses among blood donors in Paraguay.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a major concern regarding blood safety in countries with a high HBV prevalence, such as China. We aimed to understand the prevalence of HBV infection among blood donors in Chongqing and provide an important basis for developing appropriate blood screening strategies.
methodsDual enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) were conducted in parallel with nucleic acid testing (NAT) of donors. All HBsAg-reactive and/or HBV DNA-positive blood samples were tested for HBsAg and hepatitis B DNA levels.
resultsA total of 117,927 blood donor samples were collected from the Chongqing Blood Center between April 2020 and November 2020. In total, 473 HBV-ineligible samples were retained for HBsAg and DNA confirmation. A total of 272 samples were confirmed to be HBsAg+, including 2 HBV DNA - and 270 HBV DNA + samples. A total of 201 donations were HBsAg-, including 72 HBV DNA - samples. The rate of HBV infection was 65.33% (309/473) in men, which was significantly higher than that in women (p < 0.001). The HBV failure rate was higher among the first-time donors (p < 0.05). Of the 182 NAT R/HBsAg N/N samples (Nucleic acid test reactivity/2 anti-HBsAg tests negative), 37.91% (69/182) were false positives. The proportion of hepatitis B infections in the 18 NAT R/HBsAg N/R (Nucleic acid test reactivity/1 anti-HBsAg tests negative) samples was 94.44% (17/18), of which 50% (9/18) were occult HBV infection. A total of 95.83% (69/72) of the false positives were from the NAT R/HBsAg N/N group, and 58.33% (42/72) were first-time donors.
conclusionOur data showed a strikingly high HBV infection rate among blood donors in Chongqing. Double ELISA and single NAT can effectively prevent HBV leakage and improve blood safety. First-time donors have a high rate of HBV transplant failure; therefore, donors should be retained and recruited from low-risk groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.