Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39179912›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

Health-related quality of life in vibrant soundbridge patients: generic and specific measures, short-term and long-term outcomes.

Franz Muigg, Philipp Zelger, Sonja Rossi, Heike Kühn, Joachim Schmutzhard, Simone Graf, Viktor Weichbold

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Franz MuiggSpeech & Voice Disorders, University Hospital for Hearing, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Philipp ZelgerSpeech & Voice Disorders, University Hospital for Hearing, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. Philipp.Zelger@i-med.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6543-7620
Sonja RossiSpeech & Voice Disorders, University Hospital for Hearing, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Heike KühnComprehensive Hearing Center Würzburg, University-ENT-Hospital, Würzburg, Germany.
Joachim SchmutzhardDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, 6020, Austria.
Simone GrafSpeech & Voice Disorders, University Hospital for Hearing, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Viktor WeichboldSpeech & Voice Disorders, University Hospital for Hearing, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe goal of the study was to determine the short- and long-term outcome of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in adults implanted with a Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB).

methodsTwenty-one adults (8 females, 13 males; mean age at implantation: 57 ±10 years) who received a unilateral VSB for combined or conductive hearing loss, were administered two questionnaires: the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) as a measure of hearing-specific HRQoL, and the Health Utility Index 3 (HUI 3) as a measure of generic HRQoL. The questionnaires were administered before implantation and three, six, 12 and 24 months after processor activation.

resultsThe NCIQ total score raised significantly from 62 points before implantation to 76 points at three months after processor activation (p < 0.005). Thereafter, no significant increases occurred anymore. The HUI 3 multi-attribute score (MAUS) increased from 0.59 before implantation to 0.70 at three months and at six months after processor activation and then declined slightly to 0.68 at 24 months after processor activation. Similar values were observed with the HUI 3 single-attribute score (SAUS) of Hearing. The increases of the HUI 3 scores were not statistically significant, but all pre-post-implantation differences were clinically relevant. DISCUSSION: VSB recipients experienced a quick improvement of their HRQoL. After just three months of device use, a significant improvement of hearing-specific HRQoL and a clinically relevant improvement of generic HRQoL were seen. After three months, no essential changes of HRQoL occurred in our sample, suggesting that the achieved level of HRQoL may remain stable in the long term.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHearing AidsHearing Loss, ConductiveHumansMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeActive middle ear ImplantAudiologyQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID39179912
PMCPMC11564196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.