ReviewPediatric research2025
Neurobehavioral outcomes of preterm infants: toward a holistic approach.
Review in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anxiety Symptoms in Preschool Children Born Very Preterm: Associations with Cognition and Neonatal Striatal Volumes.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cognition, internalizing symptoms and neonatal cingulate-amygdala interaction in children born very low birth weight.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Efficacy analysis of comprehensive rehabilitation therapy based on the Gesell developmental schedules among infants with global developmental delay of different ages: a retrospective study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Enhancing the feeding journey of the preterm infant in the NICU: the STAmmi VICINO pathway as a model of integrated and individualized neurodevelopmental care.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Children born very preterm (VPT; <32 weeks gestation) are at high risk for adverse developmental outcomes, yet not all children fare poorly. Some children born VPT have few or no neurodevelopmental concerns, while others have significant impairment in one or more domains. Historically, research has taken a variable-centered approach, reporting rates of impairment in single domains or single assessments as if they are independent of one another. More recently, child-centered approaches have been applied to studying outcomes for preterm children. Child-centered analyses allow us to integrate across multiple measures and domains to more holistically describe groups of children who vary in terms of the severity and co-occurrence of neurodevelopmental and behavioral strengths and difficulties. In this review, we will summarize current research that has taken a "whole child" approach to describing neurodevelopmental outcomes following preterm birth while highlighting the implications of this approach for research and clinical practice. We end by describing unanswered questions and areas that are in need of future research. IMPACT: Most research on outcomes for children born very preterm has reported rates of impairment in single domains or on single instruments. Recent findings suggest that a child-centered approach can identify unique phenotypes composed of multiple measures and domains that may be of clinical interest. A better understanding of unique combinations of neurodevelopmental and behavioral strengths and weaknesses could improve post-NICU care by emphasizing a personalized approach to intervention and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.