Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39179855›Full record

Trial reportNature medicine2024

Effect of a digital school-based intervention on adolescent family planning and reproductive health in Rwanda: a cluster-randomized trial.

Rebecca Hémono, Emmyson Gatare, Laetitia Kayitesi, Lauren A Hunter, Laura Packel, Nicole Ippoliti, Diego Cerecero-García, David Contreras-Loya, Paola Gadsden, Sergio Bautista-Arredondo and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04198272 (Impact Evaluation of CyberRwanda), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04198272 nacompletednot on this map

Impact Evaluation of CyberRwanda: A Digital Health Intervention for Adolescents

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, BerkeleyRan2021 to 2023Enrolled6,078ConditionsPregnancy in Adolescence, Adolescent Health, Health Services AccessibilityArmsCyberRwanda
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Rebecca Hémono *University of California, Berkeley, School of Public Health, Berkeley, CA, USA. rebeccahemono@berkeley.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3753-9344
Emmyson Gatare *YLabs Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Laetitia KayitesiYLabs Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Lauren A HunterUniversity of California, Berkeley, School of Public Health, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Laura PackelUniversity of California, Berkeley, School of Public Health, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Nicole IppolitiYLabs USA, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Diego Cerecero-GarcíaImperial College London, School of Public Health, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Public Health Policy Evaluation Unit, London, UK.
David Contreras-LoyaTecnologico de Monterrey, Institute for Obesity Research, Monterrey, Mexico.
Paola GadsdenHealth Research Consortium (CISIDAT), Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Sergio Bautista-ArredondoNational Institute of Public Health (INSP), Cuernavaca, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8910-3011
Felix SayinzogaYLabs Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Michael MugishaUniversity of Rwanda, School of Public Health, Gasabo, Rwanda.
Stefano M BertozziUniversity of California, Berkeley, School of Public Health, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Rebecca HopeYLabs USA, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2749-2784
Sandra I McCoyUniversity of California, Berkeley, School of Public Health, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Funding

David and Lucile Packard Foundation (David & Lucile Packard Foundation) 2020-70884United States Agency for International Development (U.S. Agency for International Development) 7200AA18CA00047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a cluster-randomized hybrid effectiveness-implementation study of CyberRwanda, a digital family planning and reproductive health intervention for Rwandan adolescents. Sixty schools were randomized 1:1:1 to control or to one of two implementation models-self-service (self-guided access on tablets) or facilitated (peer-led clubs plus tablet access) with no masking. Eligible participants were aged 12-19 years, in secondary school levels 1 or 2, and willing to provide consent or assent/parental consent and contact information for follow-up. In 2021, 6,078 randomly selected adolescents were enrolled. At 24 months, 91.3% of participants were retained and included in the primary intention-to-treat analyses (control, n = 1,845; self-service, n = 1,849 and facilitated, n = 1,858). There were no adverse events related to the study. CyberRwanda did not affect the primary outcomes of modern contraceptive use (prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.76, 1.42), childbearing (PR = 1.33; 95% CI = 0.71, 2.50) and HIV testing (PR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.91, 1.11) in the full sample. Significantly higher modern contraceptive use observed in the CyberRwanda facilitated arm in a prespecified analysis of sexually active participants suggests that longer-term evaluation is needed to examine effects as more of the study population becomes sexually active and has increased demand for contraception. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04198272 .

Indexed as

Family Planning ServicesReproductive HealthAdolescentChildContraceptionContraception BehaviorFemaleHumansMalePregnancyRwandaSchool Health ServicesSchoolsYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.