ArticleScientific reports2024
A novel image semantic communication method via dynamic decision generation network and generative adversarial network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Effectively compressing transmitted images and reducing the distortion of reconstructed images are challenges in image semantic communication. This paper proposes a novel image semantic communication model that integrates a dynamic decision generation network and a generative adversarial network to address these challenges as efficiently as possible. At the transmitter, features are extracted and selected based on the channel's signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) using semantic encoding and a dynamic decision generation network. This semantic approach can effectively compress transmitted images, thereby reducing communication traffic. At the receiver, the generator/decoder collaborates with the discriminator network, enhancing image reconstruction quality through adversarial and perceptual losses. The experimental results on the CIFAR-10 dataset demonstrate that our scheme achieves a peak SNR of 26 dB, a structural similarity of 0.9, and a compression ratio (CR) of 81.5% in an AWGN channel with an SNR of 3 dB. Similarly, in the Rayleigh fading channel, the peak SNR is 23 dB, structural similarity is 0.8, and the CR is 80.5%. The learned perceptual image patch similarity in both channels is below 0.008. These experiments thoroughly demonstrate that the proposed semantic communication is a superior deep learning-based joint source-channel coding method, offering a high CR and low distortion of reconstructed images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.