Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39179709›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Computational analysis of human gut microbial prolyl oligopeptidases (POPs) reveal candidate genes as therapeutics for celiac disease.

Soumya Nayak, Dheemanth Reddy Regati, Ramanathan Sowdhamini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Soumya NayakNational Centre for Biological Sciences (TIFR), GKVK Campus, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560065, India.
Dheemanth Reddy RegatiNational Centre for Biological Sciences (TIFR), GKVK Campus, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560065, India.
Ramanathan SowdhaminiNational Centre for Biological Sciences (TIFR), GKVK Campus, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560065, India. mini@ncbs.res.in.

Funding

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India BT/PR40187/BTIS/137/9/2021Institute of Bioinformatics and Applied Biotechnology, India IBAB/MSCB/182/2022Science and Engineering Research Board, India JBR/2021/000006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Celiac disease (CD) is a common autoimmune disorder in which the patients are unable to digest gluten, which is present in foods made up of wheat, barley and rye. Whilst diagnosis happens late in 80% of the cases, avoidance of such foods appears to be the common solution. Alternative management strategies are required for the patients and their families since CD is also genetically carried over. Probiotic therapeutics and the consumption of appropriate enzymes, such as prolyloligopeptidases (POPs), from gut-friendly bacteria could reduce the disease burden and provide a better lifestyle for CD patients. We have examined around 5000 gut bacterial genomes and identified nearly 4000 non-redundant putative POPs. A select set of 10 gut bacterial POP sequences were subject to three-dimensional modelling, ligand docking and molecular dynamics simulations where stable interactions were observed between the POPs and gluten peptides. Our study provides sequence and structural analysis of potential POP enzymes in gut bacterial genomes, which form a strong basis to offer probiotic solutions to CD patients. In particular, these enzymes could be lead future therapeutics for this disease.

Indexed as

BacteriaCeliac DiseaseGastrointestinal MicrobiomeIntestinesProlyl OligopeptidasesGenome, BacterialGlutensHumansLigandsMolecular Dynamics SimulationSerine EndopeptidasesGlutensLigandsProlyl OligopeptidasesSerine EndopeptidasesCeliac diseaseDomain architectureGluten intoleranceOligopeptidase BProlyl oligopeptidaseS9 protein family

Identifiers

PMID39179709
PMCPMC11343888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.