ArticleScientific reports2024
Aneurysm growth evaluation and detection: a computer-assisted follow-up MRA analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing precision in aneurysm volume measurement: A comparative study of techniques including an artificial intelligence-based method for endovascular coiling.Surgical neurology international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Growing intracranial aneurysms pose a high risk of rupture, making the detection and quantification of the growth crucial for timely treatment strategy adoption. In this paper we propose a computer-assisted approach based on the extraction of IA shapes from associated baseline and follow-up angiographic scans and non-rigid morphing of the two shapes. From the obtained shape deformations we computed four novel features, including differential volume (dV), surface area (dSA), aneurysm-size normalized median deformation path length (dMPL), and integral of cumulative deformation distances (dICDD). An experienced neuroradiologist manually extracted the IA shape models from the baseline and follow-up MRAs and, by utilizing size change and visual assessments, classified each aneurysm into stable with morphology changes, stable or growing. We investigated the classification performance and found that three of the novel and one cross-sectional feature exhibited significantly different mean values (p-value
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.