ArticleMolecular neurobiology2025
Molecular Characterization and Expression of Lactoferrin Receptor (LfR) in Different Regions of the Brain Responding to Lactoferrin Intervention.
Article in Molecular neurobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Iron dysregulation in the central nervous system: implications for autism spectrum disorder.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2026Review
- Preparation and evaluation of lactoferrin-modified curcumin long-circulating nanoliposomes for hypoxic brain injury therapy.Nanoscale advances · 2026Article
- Special Issue "New Insights into Lactoferrin".International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lactoferrin (LF), an iron-binding glycoprotein rich in human milk, promotes neurodevelopment and cognition, but whether it acts through the LF receptor (LfR) and its expression profile in the brain remains unknown. We characterized 972 bp of piglet brain LfR cDNA and found LfR mRNA was expressed all brain regions being highest in the frontal lobe, followed by parietal lobe, brainstem, occipital lobe, cingulate gyrus, subventricular zone, olfactory bulb, hippocampus, amygdala, cerebellum, and thalamus. LfR mRNA and protein in different regions of the brain responded to low (155 mg/kg/day) and high (285 mg/kg/day) LF supplementation of piglets from postnatal days 3 to 38. By postnatal day 39, the low LF diet significantly increased LfR protein expression in the occipital lobe compared to controls, but not the high LF diet. LfR protein in the subventricular zone of the high LF group was 42% and 38% higher than that of the low LF group and controls, respectively. There was a trend for a dose-response relationship between LF intervention and LfR protein expression only in the prefrontal and parietal lobes. LF supplementation significantly improved piglet working memory for a difficult task, which was positively correlated with LfR protein in the prefrontal, parietal, and occipital lobes, but no dose response. Brain LfR responds to dietary LF supplementation, a mechanism by which LF can promote learning and working memory through its receptor. LfR is expressed in the whole brain, and its expression level is anatomic region specific.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.