ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2025
A Scoping Review on Complications in Modern Hair Transplantation: More than Just Splitting Hairs.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complications in follicular unit excision hair transplantation: current evidence and practical approaches.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Psychological Dimensions of Hair Transplantation: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Review
- Microneedle-Mediated Transdermal Drug Delivery for the Treatment of Multiple Skin Diseases.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Mechanisms and clinical progress of adipose-derived stem cells and their derivatives in the treatment of hair loss.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- Advances in Transdermal Delivery Systems for Treating Androgenetic Alopecia.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHair restoration surgery (HRS) is a commonly performed elective procedure but to date lacks a review of the full scope of complications.
objectivesTo provide a comprehensive overview of observed complications associated with follicular unit extraction (FUE) and follicular unit transplantation (FUT). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomized control trials, cohort studies, case series, and case reports published in 1985 or later on adults (age>18). Nontraumatic or autoimmune etiologies of alopecia were excluded as procedure indications. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane databases (last search December 31, 2022). CHARTING
methodsData-charting and extraction were independently performed with two reviewers using Covidence.
resultsForty-three publications were included. Two large series reported the overall complication rate to be 1.2 and 4.7%. Common complications included bleeding requiring intervention (up to 8%), persistent numbness (up to 11%), infection (up to 11% with two reports of Kaposi varicelliform eruptions and one of mucormycosis), effluvium at donor and recipient sites (up to 4.1% and 6.5%, respectively). The most common donor-site complication was hypertrophic scarring/keloid formation after FUT (up to 15.1%). Complications at the recipient site, including crusting (up to 54.8%), frontal edema (up to 50%), and sterile folliculitis (up to 53.3%), tended to be poorly defined with a broad range of incidences.
conclusionSerious complications associated with HRS are rare in the hands of experienced providers. However, comprehensive discussions of risk must be had with prospective patients as any complication in the context of an elective procedure may be significant and psychologically devastating for the individual patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
39179656What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.