Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39179652›Full record

SynthesisNeuroradiology2025

Accuracy of vestibular schwannoma segmentation using deep learning models - a systematic review & meta-analysis.

Paweł Łajczak, Jakub Matyja, Kamil Jóźwik, Zbigniew Nawrat

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paweł ŁajczakDepartment of Biophysics, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Jordana 18, Mekelweg 5, Zabrze, 40-043,, Poland. pawel.lajczak03@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0281-5417
Jakub MatyjaTU Delft, Mekelweg 5,, Delft 2628 CD,, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-9005-7856
Kamil JóźwikDepartment of Biophysics, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Jordana 18, Mekelweg 5, Zabrze, 40-043,, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-9403-0709
Zbigniew NawratDepartment of Biophysics, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Jordana 18, Mekelweg 5, Zabrze, 40-043,, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0638-3789

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vestibular Schwannoma (VS) is a rare tumor with varied incidence rates, predominantly affecting the 60-69 age group. In the era of artificial intelligence (AI), deep learning (DL) algorithms show promise in automating diagnosis. However, a knowledge gap exists in the automated segmentation of VS using DL. To address this gap, this meta-analysis aims to provide insights into the current state of DL algorithms applied to MR images of VS. METHODOLOGY: Following 2020 PRISMA guidelines, a search across four databases was conducted. Inclusion criteria focused on articles using DL for VS MR image segmentation. The primary metric was the Dice score, supplemented by relative volume error (RVE) and average symmetric surface distance (ASSD).

resultsThe search process identified 752 articles, leading to 11 studies for meta-analysis. A QUADAS- 2 analysis revealed varying biases. The overall Dice score for 56 models was 0.89 (CI: 0.88-0.90), with high heterogeneity (I2 = 95.9%). Subgroup analyses based on DL architecture, MRI inputs, and testing set sizes revealed performance variations. 2.5D DL networks demonstrated comparable efficacy to 3D networks. Imaging input analyses highlighted the superiority of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging and mixed MRI inputs. DISCUSSION: This study fills a gap in systematic review in the automated segmentation of VS using DL techniques. Despite promising results, limitations include publication bias and high heterogeneity. Future research should focus on standardized designs, larger testing sets, and addressing biases for more reliable results. DL have promising efficacy in VS diagnosis, however further validation and standardization is needed.

conclusionIn conclusion, this meta-analysis provides comprehensive review into the current landscape of automated VS segmentation using DL. The high Dice score indicates promising agreement in segmentation, yet challenges like bias and heterogeneity must be addressed in the future research.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroma, AcousticHumansAcoustic schwannomaDeep learningMRITumor segmentationVestibular schwannoma

Identifiers

PMID39179652
PMCPMC12003617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.