ArticleScientific reports2024
On flow fluctuations in ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms: resolved numerical study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond Size: Advanced MRI Breakthroughs in Predicting Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture Risk.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Flow fluctuations have emerged as a promising hemodynamic metric for understanding of hemodynamics in intracranial aneurysms. Several investigations have reported flow instabilities using numerical tools. In this study, the occurrence of flow fluctuations is investigated using either Newtonian or non-Newtonian fluid models in five patient-specific intracranial aneurysms using high-resolution lattice Boltzmann simulation methods. Flow instabilities are quantified by computing power spectral density, proper orthogonal decomposition, and fluctuating kinetic energy of velocity fluctuations. Our simulations reveal substantial flow instabilities in two of the ruptured aneurysms, where the pulsatile inflow through the neck leads to hydrodynamic instability, particularly around the rupture position, throughout the entire cardiac cycle. In other monitoring points, the flow instability is primarily observed during the deceleration phase; typically, the fluctuations begin just after peak systole, gradually decay, and the flow returns to its original, laminar pulsatile state during diastole. Additionally, we assess the rheological impact on flow dynamics. The disparity between Newtonian and non-Newtonian outcomes remains minimal in unruptured aneurysms, with less than a 5% difference in key metrics. However, in ruptured cases, adopting a non-Newtonian model yields a substantial increase in the fluctuations within the aneurysm sac, with up to a 30% higher fluctuating kinetic energy compared to the Newtonian model. The study highlights the importance of using appropriate high-resolution simulations and non-Newtonian models to capture flow fluctuation characteristics that may be critical for assessing aneurysm rupture risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.