Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39179384›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2024

Decision-Making with Predictions of Others' Likely and Unlikely Choices in the Human Brain.

Ning Ma, Norihiro Harasawa, Kenichi Ueno, Kang Cheng, Hiroyuki Nakahara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ning MaLaboratory for Integrated Theoretical Neuroscience, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Wako 351-0198, Japan.
Norihiro HarasawaLaboratory for Integrated Theoretical Neuroscience, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Wako 351-0198, Japan.
Kenichi UenoSupport Unit for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Wako 351-0198, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9552-8294
Kang ChengSupport Unit for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Wako 351-0198, Japan.
Hiroyuki NakaharaLaboratory for Integrated Theoretical Neuroscience, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Wako 351-0198, Japan hiroyuki.nakahara@riken.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-6891-1175

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For better decisions in social interactions, humans often must understand the thinking of others and predict their actions. Since such predictions are uncertain, multiple predictions may be necessary for better decision-making. However, the neural processes and computations underlying such social decision-making remain unclear. We investigated this issue by developing a behavioral paradigm and performing functional magnetic resonance imaging and computational modeling. In our task, female and male participants were required to predict others' choices in order to make their own value-based decisions, as the outcome depended on others' choices. Results showed, to make choices, the participants mostly relied on a value difference (primary) generated from the case where others would make a likely choice, but sometimes they additionally used another value difference (secondary) from the opposite case where others make an unlikely choice. We found that the activations in the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) correlated with the primary difference while the activations in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (rdlPFC) correlated with the secondary difference. Analysis of neural coupling and temporal dynamics suggested a three-step processing network, beginning with the left amygdala signals for predictions of others' choices. Modulated by these signals, the PCC and rdlPFC reflect the respective value differences for self-decisions. Finally, the medial prefrontal cortex integrated these decision signals for a final decision. Our findings elucidate the neural process of constructing value-based decisions by predicting others and illuminate their key variables with social modulations, providing insight into the differential functional roles of these brain regions in this process.

Indexed as

BrainChoice BehaviorDecision MakingMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMalePrefrontal CortexYoung Adultcomputational modelingdorsolateral prefrontal cortexfMRIposterior cingulate cortexpredicting other individualssocial decision-making

Identifiers

PMID39179384
PMCPMC11403098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.