Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39179378›Full record

ArticleBMJ quality & safety2025

Strategies for adapting under pressure: an interview study in intensive care units.

Bethan Page, Dulcie Irving, Jane Carthey, John Welch, Helen Higham, Charles Vincent

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bethan PageDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK bethan.page@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9937-6176
Dulcie IrvingDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Jane CartheyHuman Factors and Patient Safety, Jane Carthey Consulting, Chiswick, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2042-7389
John WelchNational Institute for Health and Care Research Central London Patient Safety Research Collaborative, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Helen HighamNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5796-0377
Charles VincentDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0270-0222

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare systems are operating under substantial pressures. Clinicians and managers are constantly having to make adaptations, which are typically improvised, highly variable and not coordinated across teams. This study aimed to identify and describe the types of everyday pressures in intensive care and the adaptive strategies staff use to respond, with the longer-term aim of developing practical and coordinated strategies for managing under pressure.

methodsWe conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with 20 senior multidisciplinary healthcare professionals from intensive care units (ICUs) in 4 major hospitals in the UK. The interviews explored the everyday pressures faced by intensive care staff and the strategies they use to adapt. A thematic template analysis approach was used to analyse the data based on our previously empirically developed taxonomy of pressures and strategies.

resultsThe principal source of pressure described was a shortage of staff with the necessary skills and experience to care for the increased numbers and complexity of patients which, in turn, increased staff workload and reduced patient flow. Strategies were categorised into anticipatory (in advance of anticipated pressures) and on the day. The dynamic and unpredictable demands on ICUs meant that strategies were mostly deployed on the day, most commonly by flexing staff, prioritisation of patients and tasks and increasing modes of communication and support.

conclusionsICU staff use a wide variety of adaptive strategies at times of pressure to minimise risk and maintain a reasonable standard of care for patients. These findings provide the foundation for a portfolio of strategies, which can be flexibly employed when under pressure. There is considerable potential for training clinical leaders and teams in the effective use of adaptive strategies.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsHumansInterviews as TopicQualitative ResearchUnited KingdomWorkloadCrisis managementCritical careLeadershipQualitative researchRisk management

Identifiers

PMID39179378
PMCPMC11874268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.