ArticleJournal, genetic engineering & biotechnology2024
Whole genome sequence analysis of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain S2.5 as a potential probiotic for feed supplement in livestock production.
Article in Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic and phenotypic insights into the probiotic and antimicrobial potential of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens BCSIR-AJ strain from garlic chutney.Archives of microbiology · 2026Article
- Small non-coding RNAMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Isolation, Identification, and Genomic Characterization of a CellulolyticMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Genomic and Phenotypic Evaluation of the Gliadin-Degrading Probiotic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens EG025 from Cheonggukjang for Celiac Disease Treatment.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Article
- Multifunctional Bioactivity ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Complete genome sequence and functional characterization of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens NJF-55: a sheep-derived probiotic candidate.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- DietaryFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Bacillus licheniformis B410 Alleviates Inflammation Induced by Lipopolysaccharide and Salmonella by Inhibiting NF-κB and IRF Signaling Pathways in Macrophages.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2025Article
- Effects of dietary Bacillus velezensis Y01 supplementation on growth performance, immune function, and cecal microbiota of 1 to 42 days Langya chickens.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Effects of Qiamagu (Brassica rapa L.) polysaccharide on growth performance, immunity and gut health of yellow-feathered broilers.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSupplementing probiotics in livestock feed is increasing due to concerns over the potential harm caused by antibiotics and other chemical growth promoters. Several Bacillus sp. have been used as probiotic supplements for livestock. In this study, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens S2.5 was isolated from freshwater and its potential probiotic characteristics were evaluated in vitro. The whole genome of strain S2.5 was sequenced, and its probiotic traits were annotated using bioinformatic tools.
resultsBoth vegetative cells and spores of strain S2.5 remained stable throughout the 1.5 h of gastric juice and 48 h of intestine simulation. The strain S2.5 harbored the ability to produce glucoamylase, carboxymethyl cellulase, protease, and chitinase. It is also susceptible to all six tested antibiotics. The complete genome sequence shows genes related to acid-bile tolerance, environmental stress resistance, hydrolases, and adhesion to gut mucosa, confirming probiotic traits in the in vitro experiments.
conclusionsB. amyloliquefaciens S2.5 demonstrated potential probiotic characteristics and its genetic profile in the in vitro experiments. Further in vivo assessments of B. amyloliquefaciens S2.5 on livestock and poultry should be performed to assess its practical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.