Observational studyBMJ open2024
Correlation and consistency between resting full-cycle ratio and fractional flow reserve in assessing coronary artery function in a Chinese real-world cohort with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: a retrospective observational study.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physiological indices for evaluating balloon angioplasty outcomes in below-the-knee artery lesions of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2026Article
- Physiology guided coronary revascularization using a hybrid RFR-FFR strategy for Non ST elevation acute coronary syndrome.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe study aimed to investigate the correlation and consistency between resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) in functional assessment of coronary arteries in a Chinese real-world cohort with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS).
designRetrospective study.
settingA single-centre study in China.
participantsA total of 292 diseased vessels of 226 Chinese patients with NSTE-ACS at Cangzhou Central Hospital of Hebei Medical University from September 2021 to June 2023 were included.
methodsThe correlation between RFR and FFR, resting ratio of distal coronary artery pressure (Pd) to aortic pressure (Pa) and FFR were analysed by using Person correlation, and the consistency between RFR and FFR, resting Pd/Pa and FFR were assessed by Bland-Altman test. The diagnostic values of RFR and resting Pd/Pa for predicting FFR≤0.80 were evaluated according to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
resultsRFR and resting Pd/Pa were significantly correlated with FFR, and correlation coefficients were 0.787 (p<0.001) and 0.765 (p<0.001), respectively. We found no significant differences between RFR and FFR or between resting Pd/Pa and FFR. The areas under the ROC curves for predicting FFR≤0.80 were 0.883 (p<0.001) for RFR and 0.858 (p<0.001) for resting Pd/Pa, and the optimal critical values were 0.91 for RFR and 0.93 for resting Pd/Pa. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of RFR≤0.91 for predicting FFR≤0.80 were 79.1%, 84.0%, 76.6%, 65.1% and 90.2%, respectively.
conclusionThe current study suggests that RFR exhibits a good correlation and consistency with FFR in patients with NSTE-ACS. RFR is expected to significantly enhance the application of coronary artery functional assessment in clinical practice, thereby providing patients with more precise revascularisation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.