Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39179250›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024

PLM_Sol: predicting protein solubility by benchmarking multiple protein language models with the updated Escherichia coli protein solubility dataset.

Xuechun Zhang, Xiaoxuan Hu, Tongtong Zhang, Ling Yang, Chunhong Liu, Ning Xu, Haoyi Wang, Wen Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Engineering of a Carbonic Anhydrase fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. A review on computational models for predicting protein solubility.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xuechun ZhangKey Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1 Beichen West Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China.ORCID 0009-0000-3037-6808
Xiaoxuan HuKey Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1 Beichen West Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China.
Tongtong ZhangKey Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1 Beichen West Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China.
Ling YangKey Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1 Beichen West Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China.
Chunhong LiuKey Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1 Beichen West Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China.
Ning XuKey Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1 Beichen West Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China.
Haoyi WangKey Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1 Beichen West Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China.
Wen SunKey Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1 Beichen West Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China.

Funding

Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine 2022FH122Chinese Academy of Sciences ZDBS-LY-SM005Initiative Scientific Research Program, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences 2023IOZ0204Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, Biological Breeding-Major Projects 2023ZD0407401National Natural Science Foundation of China 32001062Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences XDA16010503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein solubility plays a crucial role in various biotechnological, industrial, and biomedical applications. With the reduction in sequencing and gene synthesis costs, the adoption of high-throughput experimental screening coupled with tailored bioinformatic prediction has witnessed a rapidly growing trend for the development of novel functional enzymes of interest (EOI). High protein solubility rates are essential in this process and accurate prediction of solubility is a challenging task. As deep learning technology continues to evolve, attention-based protein language models (PLMs) can extract intrinsic information from protein sequences to a greater extent. Leveraging these models along with the increasing availability of protein solubility data inferred from structural database like the Protein Data Bank holds great potential to enhance the prediction of protein solubility. In this study, we curated an Updated Escherichia coli protein Solubility DataSet (UESolDS) and employed a combination of multiple PLMs and classification layers to predict protein solubility. The resulting best-performing model, named Protein Language Model-based protein Solubility prediction model (PLM_Sol), demonstrated significant improvements over previous reported models, achieving a notable 6.4% increase in accuracy, 9.0% increase in F1_score, and 11.1% increase in Matthews correlation coefficient score on the independent test set. Moreover, additional evaluation utilizing our in-house synthesized protein resource as test data, encompassing diverse types of enzymes, also showcased the good performance of PLM_Sol. Overall, PLM_Sol exhibited consistent and promising performance across both independent test set and experimental set, thereby making it well suited for facilitating large-scale EOI studies. PLM_Sol is available as a standalone program and as an easy-to-use model at https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.10675340.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinEscherichia coli ProteinsSolubilityComputational BiologyDeep LearningEscherichia coliEscherichia coli Proteinsenzymes of interestprotein language modelsprotein solubility prediction

Identifiers

PMID39179250
PMCPMC11343611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.