ArticleStem cell reports2024
Dissecting the impact of differentiation stage, replicative history, and cell type composition on epigenetic clocks.
Article in Stem cell reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Regenerate to "Rejuvenate": Insights From Adult Resident Stem Cells of Aged Flatworms and Mice.Aging cell · 2025Review
- Diabetes reshapes pancreatic cancer-associated endothelial niche by accelerating senescence.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Hallmarks of stem cell aging.Cell stem cell · 2025Review
- Article
- Cellular mechanical memory: a potential tool for mesenchymal stem cell-based therapy.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- estiMAge: development of a DNA methylation clock to estimate the methylation age of single cells.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Epigenetic clocks, built on DNA methylation patterns of bulk tissues, are powerful age predictors, but their biological basis remains incompletely understood. Here, we conducted a comparative analysis of epigenetic age in murine muscle, epithelial, and blood cell types across lifespan. Strikingly, our results show that cellular subpopulations within these tissues, including adult stem and progenitor cells as well as their differentiated progeny, exhibit different epigenetic ages. Accordingly, we experimentally demonstrate that clocks can be skewed by age-associated changes in tissue composition. Mechanistically, we provide evidence that the observed variation in epigenetic age among adult stem cells correlates with their proliferative state, and, fittingly, forced proliferation of stem cells leads to increases in epigenetic age. Collectively, our analyses elucidate the impact of cell type composition, differentiation state, and replicative potential on epigenetic age, which has implications for the interpretation of existing clocks and should inform the development of more sensitive clocks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.