Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39178312›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2024

Pervasive tissue-, genetic background-, and allele-specific gene expression effects in Drosophila melanogaster.

Amanda Glaser-Schmitt, Marion Lemoine, Martin Kaltenpoth, John Parsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The regulatory architecture of gene expression variation inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amanda Glaser-SchmittDivision of Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1322-1000
Marion LemoineDepartment of Insect Symbiosis, Max-Planck-Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Martin KaltenpothDepartment of Insect Symbiosis, Max-Planck-Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
John ParschDivision of Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9068-5549

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pervasiveness of gene expression variation and its contribution to phenotypic variation and evolution is well known. This gene expression variation is context dependent, with differences in regulatory architecture often associated with intrinsic and environmental factors, and is modulated by regulatory elements that can act in cis (linked) or in trans (unlinked) relative to the genes they affect. So far, little is known about how this genetic variation affects the evolution of regulatory architecture among closely related tissues during population divergence. To address this question, we analyzed gene expression in the midgut, hindgut, and Malpighian tubule as well as microbiome composition in the two gut tissues in four Drosophila melanogaster strains and their F1 hybrids from two divergent populations: one from the derived, European range and one from the ancestral, African range. In both the transcriptome and microbiome data, we detected extensive tissue- and genetic background-specific effects, including effects of genetic background on overall tissue specificity. Tissue-specific effects were typically stronger than genetic background-specific effects, although the two gut tissues were not more similar to each other than to the Malpighian tubules. An examination of allele specific expression revealed that, while both cis and trans effects were more tissue-specific in genes expressed differentially between populations than genes with conserved expression, trans effects were more tissue-specific than cis effects. Despite there being highly variable regulatory architecture, this observation was robust across tissues and genetic backgrounds, suggesting that the expression of trans variation can be spatially fine-tuned as well as or better than cis variation during population divergence and yielding new insights into cis and trans regulatory evolution.

Indexed as

AllelesDrosophila melanogasterGenetic BackgroundAnimalsFemaleGene Expression RegulationGenetic VariationMaleMalpighian TubulesOrgan SpecificityTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID39178312
PMCPMC11376557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.